All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Teng-Feng Yang <shinrairis@gmail.com>
Cc: Heinz Mauelshagen <heinzm@redhat.com>,
	dm-devel@redhat.com, ejt@redhat.com
Subject: Re: thin_dump cannot dump the correct data mapping of thin pools
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 10:07:28 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131004140728.GA29551@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKTMprPZ01+JaT0YJhYjPd90gdhfcX-Qa1+wUcv85GffXh74aw@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Oct 04 2013 at  3:01am -0400,
Teng-Feng Yang <shinrairis@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi folks,
> 
> I have been working on an incremental backup tools of thin volumes
> created by dm-thin for a couple of months.
> This tool relies on the data mappings dumped by thin_dump from the
> thin-provisioing-tools.
> As I update thin_dump from version 0.1.5 to 0.2.7, it cannot work
> correctly as the earlier 0.1.5 version.
> 
> The following things have been observed:
> 1. thin_dump-0.2.7 cannot take user-specified "metadata_snap" as
> v0.1.5. It will always return "bad checksum in superblock".
> 2. If "metadata_snap" is not given by users, thin_dump-0.2.7 only
> dumps the out-dated data mappings which can be recognized by observing
> the wrong "transaction id".
> 
> Since it looked like thin_dump failed to get the most up-to-date
> metadata blocks in version 0.2.7, I dig a little deeper into the
> source code and find something that might cause the problem.
> The open flag used on metadata device has been changed from "O_DIRECT
> | O_SYNC" to "0" in commit 4deb1751a650010ce9c15910a064be1348dec8ba .
> After I changed this back to "O_DIRECT | O_SYNC" in version 0.2.7, it
> works as expected once again.
> 
> So here is my question.
> Can I change this flag back to "O_DIRECT | O_SYNC" in any newer version?
> I am worry about that I might accidentally mess something up by
> changing this flag.
> Also, what's the purpose to get rid of the "O_DIRECT" and "O_SYNC"
> flags when we migrate to version 0.2.x?

Getting rid of O_DIRECT provided a fix for this issue:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960284

It is strange that buffered IO breaks thin_dump though.  Joe and/or
Heinz, any ideas?

  reply	other threads:[~2013-10-04 14:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-04  7:01 thin_dump cannot dump the correct data mapping of thin pools Teng-Feng Yang
2013-10-04 14:07 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2013-10-04 14:56 ` Joe Thornber

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131004140728.GA29551@redhat.com \
    --to=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=ejt@redhat.com \
    --cc=heinzm@redhat.com \
    --cc=shinrairis@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.