From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754559Ab3JDTcN (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Oct 2013 15:32:13 -0400 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:54420 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751222Ab3JDTcM (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Oct 2013 15:32:12 -0400 Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 21:32:03 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Paul McKenney , Mel Gorman , Rik van Riel , Srikar Dronamraju , Ingo Molnar , Andrea Arcangeli , Johannes Weiner , Thomas Gleixner , Steven Rostedt , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] rcusync: validations + dtor + exclusive Message-ID: <20131004193203.GV15690@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20131004184614.GA17536@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131004184614.GA17536@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 08:46:14PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > Hello. > > On top of Peter's "[PATCH 0/3] Optimize the cpu hotplug locking" > series. > > It seems that Paul and Peter agree with 1-3, and they are simple. Yeah, ACK on those.. shall I pick them up and stuff them through tip with the rest of the lot? > 4-5 should be ignored without the explicit ack. Peter seems to > dislike the exclusive mode. I disagree but I am not going to argue. > (well, at least right now ;) Lets have another few rounds of email on that one; maybe I'll get used to it :-)