From: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] env_mmc: fix buffer allocation for armv7
Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2013 16:42:14 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131006204214.GO15917@bill-the-cat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131005195728.AE316380A3C@gemini.denx.de>
On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 09:57:28PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Tom Rini,
>
> In message <20131004170203.GL15917@bill-the-cat> you wrote:
> >
> > I really don't like this. We're now allocating for example 256KiB on
> > the stack, rather than malloc. I posted a patch recently to convert the
> > non-redundant case to malloc instead for this reason. I believe the
> > answer is we need to be using memalign here, like
> > common/bouncebuf.c::bounce_buffer_start does. Can you do this? If not,
> > can you test a patch? Thanks.
>
> What exactly don't you like in using the stack for temporary data
> buffers? That's what it has been invented for. Using malloc() is
> only useful when the allocated buffers neet to be kept across file
> scope, which appears not to be the case here.
>
> For file scope buffers, usign the satck is the most efficient and
> preferred approach - it's fast and results in minimal (virtually no)
> code.
>
> Why do you hesitate to use the stack?
Mainly to allow us to work in restricted stack areas like SPL where we
simply may not have that much space available.
--
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20131006/c2026da9/attachment.pgp>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-06 20:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-04 13:48 [U-Boot] [PATCH] env_mmc: fix buffer allocation for armv7 Markus Niebel
2013-10-04 17:02 ` Tom Rini
2013-10-05 19:57 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-10-06 20:42 ` Tom Rini [this message]
2013-10-07 5:34 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-10-07 12:20 ` Tom Rini
2013-10-07 13:58 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-10-08 13:44 ` Tom Rini
2013-10-08 18:17 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-10-11 18:27 ` Tom Rini
2013-10-07 7:58 ` Markus Niebel
2013-10-14 20:26 ` [U-Boot] " Tom Rini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131006204214.GO15917@bill-the-cat \
--to=trini@ti.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.