From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from vms173005pub.verizon.net (vms173005pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.5]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DF4B610DC for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 20:35:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gandalf.denix.org ([unknown] [108.45.150.102]) by vms173005.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0MUB000WIFV3YEM2@vms173005.mailsrvcs.net> for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 07 Oct 2013 15:35:28 -0500 (CDT) Received: by gandalf.denix.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9C6F020101; Mon, 07 Oct 2013 16:35:27 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2013 16:35:27 -0400 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: Laszlo Papp Message-id: <20131007203527.GG18775@denix.org> References: <20131007180120.GC18775@denix.org> <20131007202956.718ce202@e6520eb> <20131007183739.GD18775@denix.org> <20131007205710.386447ba@e6520eb> <20131007193306.GT6240@jama> <20131007194922.GE18775@denix.org> <20131007201536.GU6240@jama> <20131007202336.GF18775@denix.org> MIME-version: 1.0 In-reply-to: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [meta-qt5] Update to 5.1.1? X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2013 20:35:37 -0000 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-disposition: inline Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 09:29:50PM +0100, Laszlo Papp wrote: > On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 10:15:36PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 03:49:22PM -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 08:43:48PM +0100, Laszlo Papp wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 8:33 PM, Martin Jansa > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 08:57:10PM +0200, Eric Bénard wrote: > > > > > > > Le Mon, 07 Oct 2013 14:37:39 -0400, > > > > > > > Denys Dmytriyenko a écrit : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 08:29:56PM +0200, Eric Bénard wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi Denys, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Le Mon, 07 Oct 2013 14:01:20 -0400, > > > > > > > > > Denys Dmytriyenko a écrit : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin, Otavio, et al, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Are you planning on updating Qt version in master to 5.1.1 > > any > > > > > > time soon, > > > > > > > > > > preferably before 1.5 release? :) If nobody looked into > > that yet, > > > > > > will you be > > > > > > > > > > open to take patches for the same? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have 5.1.1 in test here. I expect to send the patch in the > > coming > > > > > > > > > days. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks! Sounds good. Let me know if you need help in testing! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as soon as it finish to compile here I'll send the patch serie > > for > > > > > > > testing. > > > > > > > > > > > > +Laszlo > > > > > > > > > > > > Laszlo also said that he is working on patches for 5.1.1 I don't > > know > > > > > > how far he got.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Not any far, sorry, but I would be happy to use someone else's > > patches. By > > > > > the way, it would be nice to have 5.2.0 alpha (and later beta) > > updates > > > > > soon, too. > > > > > > > > Having 5.2.0 alpha would be nice, but that's probably too unstable to > > try and > > > > get in before Dora release. I want 5.1.1 as the latest stable to get > > into > > > > Dora. :) So, I'm offering any help to expedite things like testing and > > such :) > > > > > > I've already branched meta-qt5/dora before removing 5.0.2 recipes from > > > master. > > > > > > I'm willing to "backport" 5.1.1 from master to dora or even remove 5.0.2 > > > there as well, but last time I've asked around nobody responded to say > > > if they are still using 5.0.2 or 5.1.* is good enough for everybody. > > > > Sorry for not responding before, but for our needs 5.0.2 is not sufficient, > > 5.1.x and specifically 5.1.1 is preferred. I would very appreciate > > backporting > > 5.1.1 into Dora > > Be careful with this. I assume you mean the dora branch as opposed to the > Dora poky release. Not to sound rude and I mean no offense to our Poky friends, but I don't care about Poky release here. I care about the Yocto Project unified tagging and branching strategy, so yes, Dora branch is what I meant. And besides, Poky release does not contain meta-qt5, as far as I know. -- Denys