From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joel Becker Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 17:06:09 -0700 Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 0/5] nocontrold: Eliminating ocfs2_controld v3 In-Reply-To: <524ED84E.4040109@suse.de> References: <20131003054851.GA12878@shrek.lan> <20131003112528.GR20001@suse.de> <524ED84E.4040109@suse.de> Message-ID: <20131008000608.GK5358@localhost> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 10:01:34AM -0500, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote: > On 10/03/2013 06:25 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: > > On 2013-10-03T00:48:55, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote: > > > > And, perhaps, a compile-time option to disable this earlier, so that > > users can choose the stacks they want to build the kernel with. > > > > This would a be a couple of ifdef's in user_cluster_connect(). What do > other ocfs2 developers feel about this? We already allow building of o2cb/user stacks via .config. So on that note it isn't terribly different. lmb, why do you want to enforce non-controld? Shouldn't it be just fine to not install controld and let the filesystem detect a modern enough fs/dlm? Joel > > > -- > Goldwyn > > _______________________________________________ > Ocfs2-devel mailing list > Ocfs2-devel at oss.oracle.com > https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel -- Life's Little Instruction Book #306 "Take a nap on Sunday afternoons." http://www.jlbec.org/ jlbec at evilplan.org