From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
akpm@linuxfoundation.org, Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [raw v1 0/4] Replace __this_cpu ops with raw_cpu_ops where necessary
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 09:27:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131008072743.GB4455@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0000014194309038-3923fc42-2039-45da-b8fa-2df545112405-000000@email.amazonses.com>
* Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> wrote:
> The kernel can detect __this_cpu ops in preemptible contexts after
> the preemption check patchset that I posted last week.
>
> Here is a selection of patches to fix false positives caused by
> the additional checks. So far I have found no bug. Amazing.
> Looks like there was some prior work done to shake these things out?
>
> I ran an upstream kernel using Ubuntu 13.04 + the preempt checking +
> the patches below on my desktop and with the following patches no
> __this_cpu ops triggered messages. The kernel had the default Ubuntu
> desktop configuration (+ CONFIG_PREEMPT + CONFIG_DEBUG_THIS_CPU_OPERATIONS).
Here are the current list of technical problems that still plague your
submission:
- see the technical questions I raised about the snmp patch
- broken threading resulting in patches arriving out of order. (You
ignored peterz's helpful suggestion to upgrade Quilt which would allow
you to fix this.)
- broken subject lines - no 'PATCH' for patches
- inconsistent patch titles: broken, inconsistent subsystem tags, etc.
- incomplete changelogs: you fail to quote the false positive that led
you to a change. In cases this results in a totally context-free
changelog which loses information the moment it's committed upstream.
In particular the last 4 items were mentioned to you for your last
submission - which you failed to fix. You should wait with your next
submission until you have enough time to fix *all* problems that were
reported to you, not just some.
All in one, still a sloppy, incomplete submission.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-08 7:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-07 18:31 [raw v1 0/4] Replace __this_cpu ops with raw_cpu_ops where necessary Christoph Lameter
2013-10-08 7:27 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2013-10-08 10:29 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131008072743.GB4455@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=srostedt@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.