From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lars Marowsky-Bree Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 22:02:39 +0200 Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 0/5] nocontrold: Eliminating ocfs2_controld v3 In-Reply-To: <20131008000608.GK5358@localhost> References: <20131003054851.GA12878@shrek.lan> <20131003112528.GR20001@suse.de> <524ED84E.4040109@suse.de> <20131008000608.GK5358@localhost> Message-ID: <20131008200239.GC31087@suse.de> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com On 2013-10-07T17:06:09, Joel Becker wrote: > We already allow building of o2cb/user stacks via .config. So on that > note it isn't terribly different. > > lmb, why do you want to enforce non-controld? Shouldn't it be just fine > to not install controld and let the filesystem detect a modern enough > fs/dlm? It's mostly an issue of what the distribution kernels wish to support. One less variable to control for. We either get that choice upstream or carry an out of tree patch, hence my proposal to do it upstream ;-) Regards, Lars -- Architect Storage/HA SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend?rffer, HRB 21284 (AG N?rnberg) "Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde