From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 10/13] make dump_emit() use vfs_write() instead of banging at ->f_op->write directly
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 02:18:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131009011833.GE13318@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFxvNhuXoux88tcYemMWe5Nxdc-srfj3YgBZ7LJ-JaBEdQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 05:52:42PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> >
> > ... and deal with short writes properly
>
> .. except you don't.
>
> > + while (nr) {
> > + if (dump_interrupted())
> > + return 0;
> > + n = vfs_write(file, addr, nr, &pos);
> > + if (n < 0)
> > + return 0;
> > + file->f_pos = pos;
> > + cprm->written += n;
> > + nr -= n;
> > + }
>
> Please handle 'n == 0' too. Maybe it never happens (ie you get EPIPE
> or ENOSPC), but write returning zero is actually possible and a valid
> return value and traditional for "end of media". Looping forever is
> not a good idea.
Point, but I would argue that we should yell very loud if we get 0 from
vfs_write() for non-zero size. I'm not sure if POSIX allows write(2)
to return that, but a lot of userland code won't be expecting that and
won't be able to cope...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-09 1:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-09 0:15 [RFC][PATCH 10/13] make dump_emit() use vfs_write() instead of banging at ->f_op->write directly Al Viro
2013-10-09 0:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-10-09 1:18 ` Al Viro [this message]
2013-10-09 1:20 ` Al Viro
2013-10-09 1:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-10-09 2:06 ` Al Viro
2013-10-09 2:27 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131009011833.GE13318@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.