From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky at gmail.com>
To: powertop@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [Powertop] [PATCH] intel_cpus: add support for Silvermont/Baytrail-M CPU
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 12:21:38 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131009092138.GA2210@swordfish.datadirectnet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1381276268-23515-1-git-send-email-kristen@linux.intel.com
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3872 bytes --]
On (10/08/13 16:51), Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote:
> ---
> src/cpu/intel_cpus.cpp | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
> src/cpu/intel_cpus.h | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
merged to -next
-ss
> diff --git a/src/cpu/intel_cpus.cpp b/src/cpu/intel_cpus.cpp
> index 5b2e205..3348dba 100644
> --- a/src/cpu/intel_cpus.cpp
> +++ b/src/cpu/intel_cpus.cpp
> @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ static int intel_cpu_models[] = {
> 0x3A, /* IVB */
> 0x3C,
> 0x3D, /* IVB Xeon */
> + 0x37, /* BYT-M */
> 0 /* last entry must be zero */
> };
>
> @@ -96,7 +97,12 @@ nhm_core::nhm_core(int model)
> has_c2c7_res = 1;
> }
>
> - has_c3_res = 1;
> + /* BYT-M does not support C3/C4 */
> + if (model == 0x37) {
> + has_c3_res = 0;
> + has_c1_res = 1;
> + } else
> + has_c3_res = 1;
> }
>
> void nhm_core::measurement_start(void)
> @@ -109,6 +115,8 @@ void nhm_core::measurement_start(void)
>
> last_stamp = 0;
>
> + if (this->has_c1_res)
> + c1_before = get_msr(first_cpu, MSR_CORE_C1_RESIDENCY);
> if (this->has_c3_res)
> c3_before = get_msr(first_cpu, MSR_CORE_C3_RESIDENCY);
> c6_before = get_msr(first_cpu, MSR_CORE_C6_RESIDENCY);
> @@ -116,6 +124,8 @@ void nhm_core::measurement_start(void)
> c7_before = get_msr(first_cpu, MSR_CORE_C7_RESIDENCY);
> tsc_before = get_msr(first_cpu, MSR_TSC);
>
> + if (this->has_c1_res)
> + insert_cstate("core c1", "C1 (cc1)", 0, c1_before, 1);
> if (this->has_c3_res)
> insert_cstate("core c3", "C3 (cc3)", 0, c3_before, 1);
> insert_cstate("core c6", "C6 (cc6)", 0, c6_before, 1);
> @@ -149,6 +159,8 @@ void nhm_core::measurement_end(void)
> uint64_t time_delta;
> double ratio;
>
> + if (this->has_c1_res)
> + c1_after = get_msr(first_cpu, MSR_CORE_C1_RESIDENCY);
> if (this->has_c3_res)
> c3_after = get_msr(first_cpu, MSR_CORE_C3_RESIDENCY);
> c6_after = get_msr(first_cpu, MSR_CORE_C6_RESIDENCY);
> @@ -156,6 +168,8 @@ void nhm_core::measurement_end(void)
> c7_after = get_msr(first_cpu, MSR_CORE_C7_RESIDENCY);
> tsc_after = get_msr(first_cpu, MSR_TSC);
>
> + if (this->has_c1_res)
> + finalize_cstate("core c1", 0, c1_after, 1);
> if (this->has_c3_res)
> finalize_cstate("core c3", 0, c3_after, 1);
> finalize_cstate("core c6", 0, c6_after, 1);
> @@ -241,12 +255,18 @@ nhm_package::nhm_package(int model)
> case 0x2D: /* SNB Xeon */
> case 0x3A: /* IVB */
> case 0x3C:
> + case 0x37:
> case 0x3D: /* IVB Xeon */
> case 0x45:
> has_c2c7_res = 1;
> }
>
> - has_c3_res = 1;
> + /* BYT-M doesn't have C3 */
> + if (model == 0x37)
> + has_c3_res = 0;
> + else
> + has_c3_res = 1;
> +
>
> /* Haswell-ULT has C8/9/10*/
> if (model == 0x45)
> diff --git a/src/cpu/intel_cpus.h b/src/cpu/intel_cpus.h
> index 4a51494..57afd8a 100644
> --- a/src/cpu/intel_cpus.h
> +++ b/src/cpu/intel_cpus.h
> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@
> #define MSR_PKG_C8_RESIDENCY 0x630
> #define MSR_PKG_C9_RESIDENCY 0x631
> #define MSR_PKG_C10_RESIDENCY 0x632
> +#define MSR_CORE_C1_RESIDENCY 0x660
> #define MSR_CORE_C3_RESIDENCY 0x3FC
> #define MSR_CORE_C6_RESIDENCY 0x3FD
> #define MSR_CORE_C7_RESIDENCY 0x3FE
> @@ -73,6 +74,7 @@ public:
> class nhm_core: public cpu_core
> {
> private:
> + uint64_t c1_before, c1_after;
> uint64_t c3_before, c3_after;
> uint64_t c6_before, c6_after;
> uint64_t c7_before, c7_after;
> @@ -81,6 +83,7 @@ private:
> uint64_t last_stamp;
> uint64_t total_stamp;
> public:
> + int has_c1_res;
> int has_c2c7_res;
> int has_c3_res;
> nhm_core(int model);
> --
> 1.8.3.2
>
> _______________________________________________
> PowerTop mailing list
> PowerTop(a)lists.01.org
> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/powertop
>
next reply other threads:[~2013-10-09 9:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-09 9:21 Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-10-08 23:51 [Powertop] [PATCH] intel_cpus: add support for Silvermont/Baytrail-M CPU Kristen Carlson Accardi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131009092138.GA2210@swordfish.datadirectnet.com \
--to=powertop@lists.01.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.