From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755123Ab3JLAun (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Oct 2013 20:50:43 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f53.google.com ([209.85.220.53]:57514 "EHLO mail-pa0-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752319Ab3JLAuk (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Oct 2013 20:50:40 -0400 Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 17:50:33 -0700 From: Guenter Roeck To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [ 00/48] 3.4.66-stable review Message-ID: <20131012005033.GA12586@roeck-us.net> References: <20131011193637.253208688@linuxfoundation.org> <20131011215619.GB9941@roeck-us.net> <20131011221241.GB9702@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131011221241.GB9702@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 03:12:41PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 02:56:19PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:36:07PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.4.66 release. > > > There are 48 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > > let me know. > > > > > > Responses should be made by Sun Oct 13 19:35:35 UTC 2013. > > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.4.66-rc1.gz > > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > > Less than perfect test results: > > total: 103 pass: 83 skipped: 10 fail: 10 > > > > New failures appear to be due to: > > 'powerpc: Restore registers on error exit from csum_partial_copy_generic()'. > > which causes six of the powerpc builds to fail. > > Ick, that also looks to break the 3.0 build. I'll go drop it from both > trees and do a -rc2 release, thanks for letting me know. > -rc2 looks better: total: 103 pass: 89 skipped: 10 fail: 4 qemu tests all pass. This matches previous results. Please see http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders for details. Thanks, Guenter