From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
To: kvm-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Get rid of mandatory huge page defines
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2013 17:49:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131013174928.GE14789@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1380748953-7864-1-git-send-email-christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 06:41:22PM +0100, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 12:31:29PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 10:36:36AM -0700, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 02:22:27PM -0700, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> > > > The current KVM code relies on a number of definitions to exist for each
> > > > architecture:
> > > > KVM_HPAGE_GFN_SHIFT
> > > > KVM_NR_HPAGE_SIZES
> > > > KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE
> > > >
> > > > However, these defines are only used in the gfn_to_index function, which
> > > > is only used in the x86 code. This series moves the gfn_to_index
> > > > function from the generic KVM code into the x86 world and gets rid of
> > > > the definitions from archiectures that don't use them. s390 actually
> > > > uses these values in other code, so we leave that part untouched.
> > > >
> > > > Patches based on kvm/next and available here:
> > > > git://git.linaro.org/people/cdall/linux-kvm-arm.git kvm-pagesize-cleanup
> > > >
> > > > Christoffer Dall (6):
> > > > KVM: Move gfn_to_index to x86 specific code
> > > > KVM: ARM: Get rid of KVM_HPAGE defines
> > > > KVM: arm64: Get rid of KVM_HPAGE defines
> > > > KVM: mips: Get rid of KVM_HPAGE defines
> > > > KVM: ia64: Get rid of KVM_HPAGE defines
> > > > KVM: PPC: Get rid of KVM_HPAGE defines
> > > >
> > >
> > > Any comments on this one? I'd very much like to merge huge page support
> > > for KVM/ARM during the next merge window and it depends on this
> > > series.
> > >
> > Looks fine to me, but why have you skipped s390?
> >
>
> Because the defines are actually used in their code, see above:
>
> "... s390 actually uses these values in other code, so we leave that
> part untouched."
>
It does? Where? I actually removed then and the code still build.
> Will you apply these from the mailing list or should I send you a pull
> request?
>
I will apply them from the mailing list.
--
Gleb.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
To: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, kvm-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Get rid of mandatory huge page defines
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2013 17:49:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131013174928.GE14789@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131013174122.GA53064@lvm>
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 06:41:22PM +0100, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 12:31:29PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 10:36:36AM -0700, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 02:22:27PM -0700, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> > > > The current KVM code relies on a number of definitions to exist for each
> > > > architecture:
> > > > KVM_HPAGE_GFN_SHIFT
> > > > KVM_NR_HPAGE_SIZES
> > > > KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE
> > > >
> > > > However, these defines are only used in the gfn_to_index function, which
> > > > is only used in the x86 code. This series moves the gfn_to_index
> > > > function from the generic KVM code into the x86 world and gets rid of
> > > > the definitions from archiectures that don't use them. s390 actually
> > > > uses these values in other code, so we leave that part untouched.
> > > >
> > > > Patches based on kvm/next and available here:
> > > > git://git.linaro.org/people/cdall/linux-kvm-arm.git kvm-pagesize-cleanup
> > > >
> > > > Christoffer Dall (6):
> > > > KVM: Move gfn_to_index to x86 specific code
> > > > KVM: ARM: Get rid of KVM_HPAGE defines
> > > > KVM: arm64: Get rid of KVM_HPAGE defines
> > > > KVM: mips: Get rid of KVM_HPAGE defines
> > > > KVM: ia64: Get rid of KVM_HPAGE defines
> > > > KVM: PPC: Get rid of KVM_HPAGE defines
> > > >
> > >
> > > Any comments on this one? I'd very much like to merge huge page support
> > > for KVM/ARM during the next merge window and it depends on this
> > > series.
> > >
> > Looks fine to me, but why have you skipped s390?
> >
>
> Because the defines are actually used in their code, see above:
>
> "... s390 actually uses these values in other code, so we leave that
> part untouched."
>
It does? Where? I actually removed then and the code still build.
> Will you apply these from the mailing list or should I send you a pull
> request?
>
I will apply them from the mailing list.
--
Gleb.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
To: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, kvm-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Get rid of mandatory huge page defines
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2013 20:49:28 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131013174928.GE14789@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131013174122.GA53064@lvm>
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 06:41:22PM +0100, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 12:31:29PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 10:36:36AM -0700, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 02:22:27PM -0700, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> > > > The current KVM code relies on a number of definitions to exist for each
> > > > architecture:
> > > > KVM_HPAGE_GFN_SHIFT
> > > > KVM_NR_HPAGE_SIZES
> > > > KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE
> > > >
> > > > However, these defines are only used in the gfn_to_index function, which
> > > > is only used in the x86 code. This series moves the gfn_to_index
> > > > function from the generic KVM code into the x86 world and gets rid of
> > > > the definitions from archiectures that don't use them. s390 actually
> > > > uses these values in other code, so we leave that part untouched.
> > > >
> > > > Patches based on kvm/next and available here:
> > > > git://git.linaro.org/people/cdall/linux-kvm-arm.git kvm-pagesize-cleanup
> > > >
> > > > Christoffer Dall (6):
> > > > KVM: Move gfn_to_index to x86 specific code
> > > > KVM: ARM: Get rid of KVM_HPAGE defines
> > > > KVM: arm64: Get rid of KVM_HPAGE defines
> > > > KVM: mips: Get rid of KVM_HPAGE defines
> > > > KVM: ia64: Get rid of KVM_HPAGE defines
> > > > KVM: PPC: Get rid of KVM_HPAGE defines
> > > >
> > >
> > > Any comments on this one? I'd very much like to merge huge page support
> > > for KVM/ARM during the next merge window and it depends on this
> > > series.
> > >
> > Looks fine to me, but why have you skipped s390?
> >
>
> Because the defines are actually used in their code, see above:
>
> "... s390 actually uses these values in other code, so we leave that
> part untouched."
>
It does? Where? I actually removed then and the code still build.
> Will you apply these from the mailing list or should I send you a pull
> request?
>
I will apply them from the mailing list.
--
Gleb.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-13 17:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-02 21:22 [PATCH 0/6] Get rid of mandatory huge page defines Christoffer Dall
2013-10-02 21:22 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-10-02 21:22 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-10-12 17:36 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-10-12 17:36 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-10-12 17:36 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-10-13 9:31 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-10-13 9:31 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-10-13 9:31 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-10-13 17:41 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-10-13 17:41 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-10-13 17:41 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-10-13 17:49 ` Gleb Natapov [this message]
2013-10-13 17:49 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-10-13 17:49 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-10-13 19:29 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-10-13 19:29 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-10-13 19:29 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-10-14 7:20 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-10-14 7:20 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-10-14 7:20 ` Gleb Natapov
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-10-02 21:22 [PATCH 1/6] KVM: Move gfn_to_index to x86 specific code Christoffer Dall
2013-10-02 21:22 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-10-02 21:22 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-10-02 21:22 [PATCH 2/6] KVM: ARM: Get rid of KVM_HPAGE defines Christoffer Dall
2013-10-02 21:22 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-10-02 21:22 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-10-02 21:22 [PATCH 3/6] KVM: arm64: " Christoffer Dall
2013-10-02 21:22 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-10-02 21:22 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-10-02 21:22 [PATCH 4/6] KVM: mips: " Christoffer Dall
2013-10-02 21:22 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-10-02 21:22 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-10-02 21:22 [PATCH 5/6] KVM: ia64: " Christoffer Dall
2013-10-02 21:22 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-10-02 21:22 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-10-02 21:22 [PATCH 6/6] KVM: PPC: " Christoffer Dall
2013-10-02 21:22 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-10-02 21:22 ` Christoffer Dall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131013174928.GE14789@redhat.com \
--to=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.