From: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
To: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, mikey@neuling.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc, perf: Configure BHRB filter before enabling PMU interrupts
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 17:19:58 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131014061958.GA8300@concordia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52577F5C.6000704@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 10:02:28AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> On 10/11/2013 07:41 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 02:20:22PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> >
> >> Even I think this is not right. Instruction sampling should have been
> >> enabled before we enable PMU interrupts. Else there is a small window
> >> of time where we could have the PMU enabled with events (which requires
> >> sampling) without the sampling itself being enabled in MMCRA.
> >
> > Yes I agree. That's a separate bug, which we'll need to test on all the book3s
> > platforms we have perf support for.
>
> Okay, I guess any platform which supports sampling will definitely want to have
> it enabled before we can set the events to count on PMU. Can you think of any
> problem which can arise if we move it before the enabling the PMU back ? Else
> we can fix this easily.
In theory it should be a trivial change. But hardware can behave in
strange ways, it's possible on some old chip we need to do it the
current way for some reason.
So although I don't think it will be a problem, it could be, so we
will need to test it thoroughly.
cheers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-14 6:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-07 4:30 [PATCH] powerpc, perf: Configure BHRB filter before enabling PMU interrupts Anshuman Khandual
2013-10-08 4:21 ` Michael Ellerman
2013-10-08 7:21 ` Anshuman Khandual
2013-10-09 1:21 ` Michael Ellerman
2013-10-09 4:46 ` Anshuman Khandual
2013-10-09 6:03 ` Michael Ellerman
2013-10-10 8:50 ` Anshuman Khandual
2013-10-11 2:11 ` Michael Ellerman
2013-10-11 4:32 ` Anshuman Khandual
2013-10-14 6:19 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2013-10-16 4:30 ` Anshuman Khandual
2013-12-13 6:46 ` Anshuman Khandual
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-12-18 2:14 Michael Ellerman
2013-12-18 3:41 ` Anshuman Khandual
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131014061958.GA8300@concordia \
--to=michael@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=mikey@neuling.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.