From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Mon, 14 Oct 2013 12:27:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]:59419 "EHLO linux-mips.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S6816285Ab3JNK1kHp1vx (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Oct 2013 12:27:40 +0200 Received: from scotty.linux-mips.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by scotty.linux-mips.net (8.14.7/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r9EARb8i000741; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 12:27:37 +0200 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by scotty.linux-mips.net (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id r9EARXcX000740; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 12:27:33 +0200 Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 12:27:33 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: James Hogan Cc: Greg KH , Gregory Fong , linux-mips@linux-mips.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: stack protector: Fix per-task canary switch Message-ID: <20131014102733.GS3098@linux-mips.org> References: <1381144466-19736-1-git-send-email-james.hogan@imgtec.com> <20131007124859.GF3098@linux-mips.org> <20131010231617.GI4301@kroah.com> <525BADFB.4070601@imgtec.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <525BADFB.4070601@imgtec.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 38320 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: linux-mips X-List-ID: linux-mips List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-mips On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 09:40:27AM +0100, James Hogan wrote: > On 11/10/13 00:16, Greg KH wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 02:48:59PM +0200, Ralf Baechle wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 12:14:26PM +0100, James Hogan wrote: > >> > >>> Ralf: This is a regression in v3.11, so please consider for v3.12. > >> > >> Applied, will send to Linus with the next pull request. > > > > Which would be in time for 3.12-final, right? > > Yes, it's included in v3.12-rc5 as: > 8b3c569a3999a8fd5a819f892525ab5520777c92 > > >> stable folks - please apply to 3.12-stable. > > > > There is no 3.12-stable yet, as 3.12-final isn't out yet. > > > > Confused, > > I think Ralf meant v3.11-stable. It's only needed there as the > regression was introduced in v3.11-rc1. Yes, indeed. Greg, sorry for the confusion. Thanks, Ralf