Re: [Patchv5 2/7] KVM: s390: add floating irq controller

[Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>]

On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 01:13:30PM +0200, Jens Freimann wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 12:07:24PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 10:28:57AM +0200, Jens Freimann wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 11:39:55AM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 04:54:55PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> > > > > From: Jens Freimann <jfrei@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > > > > 
> > > > > This patch adds a floating irq controller as a kvm_device.
> > > > > It will be necessary for migration of floating interrupts as well
> > > > > as for hardening the reset code by allowing user space to explicitly
> > > > > remove all pending floating interrupts.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Jens Freimann <jfrei@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > > > > Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  Documentation/virtual/kvm/devices/s390_flic.txt |  36 +++
> > > > >  arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h                |   1 +
> > > > >  arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h                |   5 +
> > > > >  arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c                       | 296 ++++++++++++++++++++----
> > > > >  arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c                        |   1 +
> > > > >  include/linux/kvm_host.h                        |   1 +
> > > > >  include/uapi/linux/kvm.h                        |   1 +
> > > > >  virt/kvm/kvm_main.c                             |   5 +
> > > > >  8 files changed, 295 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
> > > > >  create mode 100644 Documentation/virtual/kvm/devices/s390_flic.txt
> > > > > 
> > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/devices/s390_flic.txt b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/devices/s390_flic.txt
> > > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > > index 0000000..06aef31
> > > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > > +++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/devices/s390_flic.txt
> > > > > @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
> > > > > +FLIC (floating interrupt controller)
> > > > > +====================================
> > > > > +
> > > > > +FLIC handles floating (non per-cpu) interrupts, i.e.  I/O, service and some
> > > > > +machine check interruptions. All interrupts are stored in a per-vm list of
> > > > > +pending interrupts. FLIC performs operations on this list.
> > > > > +
> > > > > +Only one FLIC instance may be instantiated.
> > > > > +
> > > > > +FLIC provides support to
> > > > > +- add/delete interrupts (KVM_DEV_FLIC_ENQUEUE and _DEQUEUE)
> > > > > +- purge all pending floating interrupts (KVM_DEV_FLIC_CLEAR_IRQS)
> > > > > +
> > > > > +Groups:
> > > > > +  KVM_DEV_FLIC_ENQUEUE
> > > > > +    Adds one interrupt to the list of pending floating interrupts. Interrupts
> > > > > +    are taken from this list for injection into the guest. attr contains
> > > > > +    a struct kvm_s390_irq which contains all data relevant for
> > > > > +    interrupt injection.
> > > > > +    The format of the data structure kvm_s390_irq as it is copied from userspace
> > > > > +    is defined in usr/include/linux/kvm.h.
> > > > > +    For historic reasons list members are stored in a different data structure, i.e.
> > > > > +    we need to copy the relevant data into a struct kvm_s390_interrupt_info
> > > > > +    which can then be added to the list.
> > > > > +
> > > > > +  KVM_DEV_FLIC_DEQUEUE
> > > > > +    Takes one element off the pending interrupts list and copies it into userspace.
> > > > > +    Dequeued interrupts are not injected into the guest.
> > > > > +    attr->addr contains the userspace address of a struct kvm_s390_irq.
> > > > > +    List elements are stored in the format of struct kvm_s390_interrupt_info
> > > > > +    (arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h) and are copied into a struct kvm_s390_irq
> > > > > +    (usr/include/linux/kvm.h)
> > > > > +
> > > > Can interrupt be dequeued on real HW also? When this interface will be
> > > > used?
> > > 
> > > We will it for migration. (See Christians mail)  
> > >  
> > For migration you do not need dequeue semantics though, dequeuing
> > does not hurt in case of migration, but what if we will want to add
> > QEMU monitor command that inspects interrupt queue (like we have for
> > inspecting processor's register state). The destructive nature of the
> > command will prevent us from doing so. We need non destructive way to
> > inspect the state, no?
> 
> Inspection is a requirement that we didn't have in mind when we designed 
> this. But yes, it should be non-destructive in that case.
> 
> Christian and I agree that we should defer these patches for now. It would
> be good if we could discuss this interface next week at the KVM Forum.
> 
Of course.

--
			Gleb.