From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from vms173011pub.verizon.net (vms173011pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.11]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 510C36D11A for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 16:43:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gandalf.denix.org ([unknown] [108.45.150.102]) by vms173011.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0MUO00J2U3RPQCB0@vms173011.mailsrvcs.net> for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 11:43:01 -0500 (CDT) Received: by gandalf.denix.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 03EFE200A9; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 12:42:58 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 12:42:58 -0400 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-id: <20131014164258.GG27046@denix.org> References: <5256F33C.50609@balister.org> MIME-version: 1.0 In-reply-to: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: Re: [RFC] Create meta-sdr in meta-oe X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 16:43:02 -0000 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 08:49:03PM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Op 10-10-13 20:34, Philip Balister schreef: > > At the GNU Radio conference last week, several people working with > > gnuradio on embedded systems asked about creating a meta-sdr to hold > > gnuradio and uhd. This would be the starting point for adding some other > > gnuradio out of tree applications. This could also be a home for some > > other sdr frameworks such as Iris and ALOE. > > > > Software that is more focused toward the amateur radio community should > > not end up here since there is little overlap in the developer > > communities at this time. > > > > Any comments? > > soft66 and rtl-sdr can live there as well. I have recipes for that :) I like both proposals. The only question is which is better placements - an own repo and a layer, or just another sub-layer in meta-openembedded repo? -- Denys