From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vinod Koul Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/3] ARM: S3C24XX: add missing dma-devices and warning fix Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 07:35:16 +0530 Message-ID: <20131016020516.GT2954@intel.com> References: <201310111059.19791.heiko@sntech.de> <20131013145642.GJ2954@intel.com> <201310132011.11285.heiko@sntech.de> <525DC274.8090808@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:49671 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751605Ab3JPC6Q (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Oct 2013 22:58:16 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <525DC274.8090808@samsung.com> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Kukjin Kim Cc: Heiko =?iso-8859-1?Q?St=FCbner?= , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, Sangbeom Kim , Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown , Olof Johansson , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 07:32:20AM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: > On 10/14/13 03:11, Heiko St=FCbner wrote: > >Am Sonntag, 13. Oktober 2013, 16:56:42 schrieb Vinod Koul: > >>On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 10:59:19AM +0200, Heiko St=FCbner wrote: > >>>[I messed up the linux-arm-kernel list address yesterday, so I res= end it > >>>with a fixed address, sorry for the noise] > >>> > >>>When Olof reported the warning about the unused s3c2410_dma_resour= ce, I > >>>thought the best way forward would be to simply implement the miss= ing > >>>pieces and so it has users :-) . > >>> > >>>Therefore this series adds the necessary platform-devices for s3c2= 410, > >>>s3c2440 and s3c2442. This especially also includes the > >>>channel-constraints of those socs. > >>> > >>>As I do not have access to any of those socs these changes are of = course > >>>compile-tested only. > >> > >>Do you want this to be applied thru dma or arm tree? > > > >hmm, the original series went into the samsung tree for 3.13, so may= be this > >addition should go the same way? > > > I think so, let me pick this up into Samsung tree for v3.13. Okay, sounds good. Ack for dmaengine patch sent ~Vinod From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: vinod.koul@intel.com (Vinod Koul) Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 07:35:16 +0530 Subject: [PATCH RESEND 0/3] ARM: S3C24XX: add missing dma-devices and warning fix In-Reply-To: <525DC274.8090808@samsung.com> References: <201310111059.19791.heiko@sntech.de> <20131013145642.GJ2954@intel.com> <201310132011.11285.heiko@sntech.de> <525DC274.8090808@samsung.com> Message-ID: <20131016020516.GT2954@intel.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 07:32:20AM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: > On 10/14/13 03:11, Heiko St?bner wrote: > >Am Sonntag, 13. Oktober 2013, 16:56:42 schrieb Vinod Koul: > >>On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 10:59:19AM +0200, Heiko St?bner wrote: > >>>[I messed up the linux-arm-kernel list address yesterday, so I resend it > >>>with a fixed address, sorry for the noise] > >>> > >>>When Olof reported the warning about the unused s3c2410_dma_resource, I > >>>thought the best way forward would be to simply implement the missing > >>>pieces and so it has users :-) . > >>> > >>>Therefore this series adds the necessary platform-devices for s3c2410, > >>>s3c2440 and s3c2442. This especially also includes the > >>>channel-constraints of those socs. > >>> > >>>As I do not have access to any of those socs these changes are of course > >>>compile-tested only. > >> > >>Do you want this to be applied thru dma or arm tree? > > > >hmm, the original series went into the samsung tree for 3.13, so maybe this > >addition should go the same way? > > > I think so, let me pick this up into Samsung tree for v3.13. Okay, sounds good. Ack for dmaengine patch sent ~Vinod