All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Cc: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
	Maxime Jayat <maxime@artisandeveloppeur.fr>,
	linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 16:56:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131016145652.GB16959@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1310161118070.12405@pobox.suse.cz>

On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 11:20:04AM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Oct 2013, Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote:
> 
> > > Today's linux-next merge of the trivial tree got conflicts in
> > > 
> > > 	net/netfilter/xt_set.c
> > > 
> > > caused by commits 3f79410 (treewide: Fix common typo in "identify") and
> > > bd3129f (netfilter: ipset: order matches and targets separatedly in
> > > xt_set.c).
> > > 
> > > I fixed them up (see below). Please verify that the resolution looks
> > > good.
> > 
> > I don't really get it: patch bd3129f was part of a patchset, which was 
> > applied to net-next and there it was complete.
> > 
> > There's none of the patchset in question in linux-next, so what's the 
> > trivial tree? Where's lost what?

To Jozsef: David collects all the networking patches in net-next until
Linus' merge window opens, that's why you don't see your patches in
linux-next. It seems Jiri merges this trivial tree (which indeed
contains your net-next patches already) to linux-next.

> > [The patch below doesn't look good, because it should contain the removed 
> > part for the revision 1 match due to the reordering in the file.]
> 
> This is just a super-simple conflict between
> 
> 	https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next.git/commit/?id=bd3129f
> 
> and
> 
> 	https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/jikos/trivial.git/diff/net/netfilter/xt_set.c?h=for-next&id=3f79410c7c
> 
> I don't think it needs any special handling, do you? I can of course drop 
> the respective hunk from my tree and let you handle it in net-next if you 
> wish.

Please, don't drop it, I think Jozsef got confused by the handling of
your trivial tree.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-10-16 14:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-15 14:02 linux-next: Tree for Oct 15 Thierry Reding
2013-10-15 14:02 ` linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree Thierry Reding
2013-10-16  9:12   ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2013-10-16  9:20     ` Jiri Kosina
2013-10-16 14:56       ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2013-10-16 20:10         ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2013-10-15 14:02 ` [PATCH] [media] staging: media: Fix build for iMON LIRC driver Thierry Reding
2013-10-16  7:03   ` Dan Carpenter
2013-10-16  7:03     ` Dan Carpenter
2013-10-16 14:12     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-10-16 14:12       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-10-15 19:50 ` linux-next: Tree for Oct 15 (usb gadget f_mass_storage and storage_common) Randy Dunlap
2013-10-15 22:43 ` linux-next: Tree for Oct 15 (asymmetric keys) Randy Dunlap
2013-10-16 15:52   ` Thierry Reding
2013-10-19 17:07   ` Randy Dunlap
2013-10-16  5:21 ` linux-next: Tree for Oct 15 Guenter Roeck
2013-10-16 15:50   ` Thierry Reding
2013-10-16 16:37     ` Guenter Roeck
2013-10-16 16:43       ` Thierry Reding
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-11-03  3:48 linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-12 17:48 ` Jesper Juhl
2008-07-28  3:37 Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-28  9:41 ` Nick Andrew
2008-08-27  5:19   ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-07 15:39 Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131016145652.GB16959@localhost \
    --to=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
    --cc=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maxime@artisandeveloppeur.fr \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.