From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas) Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 15:07:12 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v8 16/19] arm,arm64: do not always merge biovec if we are running on Xen In-Reply-To: References: <1382031814-8782-16-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> Message-ID: <20131018140711.GO23462@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 01:23:59PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > are you OK with this patch? > > It shouldn't have any impact when running on native, only on Xen. I don't have an opinion on what it does but since it only affects Xen, it's fine by me. Acked-by: Catalin Marinas From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755815Ab3JROIa (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Oct 2013 10:08:30 -0400 Received: from fw-tnat.cambridge.arm.com ([217.140.96.21]:52201 "EHLO cam-smtp0.cambridge.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755105Ab3JROI2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Oct 2013 10:08:28 -0400 Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 15:07:12 +0100 From: Catalin Marinas To: Stefano Stabellini Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "konrad.wilk@oracle.com" , Ian Campbell , "linux@arm.linux.org.uk" Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 16/19] arm,arm64: do not always merge biovec if we are running on Xen Message-ID: <20131018140711.GO23462@arm.com> References: <1382031814-8782-16-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 01:23:59PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > are you OK with this patch? > > It shouldn't have any impact when running on native, only on Xen. I don't have an opinion on what it does but since it only affects Xen, it's fine by me. Acked-by: Catalin Marinas From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Catalin Marinas Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 16/19] arm,arm64: do not always merge biovec if we are running on Xen Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 15:07:12 +0100 Message-ID: <20131018140711.GO23462@arm.com> References: <1382031814-8782-16-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Stefano Stabellini Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , "linux@arm.linux.org.uk" , Ian Campbell , "konrad.wilk@oracle.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 01:23:59PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > are you OK with this patch? > > It shouldn't have any impact when running on native, only on Xen. I don't have an opinion on what it does but since it only affects Xen, it's fine by me. Acked-by: Catalin Marinas