From: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.de>
To: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 6/6] Use the new DLM operation callbacks while requesting new lockspace
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 09:46:31 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131018144626.GA4598@shrek.lan> (raw)
Attempt to use the new DLM operations. If it is not supported,
use the traditional ocfs2_controld.
To exchange ocfs2 versioning, we use the LVB of the version dlm lock.
It first attempts to take the lock in EX mode (non-blocking). If
successful (which means it is the first mount), it writes the
version number and downconverts to PR lock. If it is unsuccessful,
it reads the version from the lock.
If this becomes the standard (wit o2cb as well), it could
simplify userspace tools to check if the filesystem is mounted
on other nodes.
Signed-off-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
---
fs/ocfs2/stack_user.c | 97 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 73 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/stack_user.c b/fs/ocfs2/stack_user.c
index f417d5e..c4466f5 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/stack_user.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/stack_user.c
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
#include <linux/mutex.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/reboot.h>
+#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
#include "stackglue.h"
@@ -121,6 +122,7 @@ struct ocfs2_live_connection {
struct dlm_lksb oc_version_lksb;
char oc_lvb[DLM_LVB_LEN];
struct completion oc_sync_wait;
+ wait_queue_head_t oc_wait;
};
struct ocfs2_control_private {
@@ -217,7 +219,7 @@ static int ocfs2_live_connection_new(struct ocfs2_cluster_connection *conn,
mutex_lock(&ocfs2_control_lock);
c->oc_conn = conn;
- if (atomic_read(&ocfs2_control_opened))
+ if ((c->oc_type == NO_CONTROLD) || atomic_read(&ocfs2_control_opened))
list_add(&c->oc_list, &ocfs2_live_connection_list);
else {
printk(KERN_ERR
@@ -926,6 +928,7 @@ static void user_recover_done(void *arg, struct dlm_slot *slots,
}
lc->oc_our_slot = our_slot;
+ wake_up(&lc->oc_wait);
}
const struct dlm_lockspace_ops ocfs2_ls_ops = {
@@ -934,11 +937,21 @@ const struct dlm_lockspace_ops ocfs2_ls_ops = {
.recover_done = user_recover_done,
};
+static int user_cluster_disconnect(struct ocfs2_cluster_connection *conn)
+{
+ version_unlock(conn);
+ dlm_release_lockspace(conn->cc_lockspace, 2);
+ conn->cc_lockspace = NULL;
+ ocfs2_live_connection_drop(conn->cc_private);
+ conn->cc_private = NULL;
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int user_cluster_connect(struct ocfs2_cluster_connection *conn)
{
dlm_lockspace_t *fsdlm;
struct ocfs2_live_connection *lc;
- int rc;
+ int rc, ops_rv;
BUG_ON(conn == NULL);
@@ -948,12 +961,65 @@ static int user_cluster_connect(struct ocfs2_cluster_connection *conn)
goto out;
}
- lc->oc_type = WITH_CONTROLD;
+ init_waitqueue_head(&lc->oc_wait);
+ init_completion(&lc->oc_sync_wait);
+ atomic_set(&lc->oc_this_node, 0);
+ conn->cc_private = lc;
+ lc->oc_type = NO_CONTROLD;
+
+ rc = dlm_new_lockspace(conn->cc_name, conn->cc_cluster_name,
+ DLM_LSFL_FS, DLM_LVB_LEN,
+ &ocfs2_ls_ops, conn, &ops_rv, &fsdlm);
+ if (rc)
+ goto out;
+
+ if (ops_rv == -EOPNOTSUPP) {
+ lc->oc_type = WITH_CONTROLD;
+ printk(KERN_NOTICE "ocfs2: You seem to be using an older "
+ "version of dlm_controld and/or ocfs2-tools."
+ " Please consider upgrading.\n");
+ } else if (ops_rv) {
+ rc = ops_rv;
+ goto out;
+ }
+ conn->cc_lockspace = fsdlm;
rc = ocfs2_live_connection_new(conn, lc);
if (rc)
goto out;
+ if (lc->oc_type == NO_CONTROLD) {
+ int ret;
+ lc->oc_version_lksb.sb_lvbptr = lc->oc_lvb;
+ ret = version_lock(conn, DLM_LOCK_EX,
+ DLM_LKF_VALBLK|DLM_LKF_NOQUEUE);
+ running_proto.pv_major =
+ ocfs2_user_plugin.sp_max_proto.pv_major;
+ running_proto.pv_minor =
+ ocfs2_user_plugin.sp_max_proto.pv_minor;
+ if (!ret) {
+ conn->cc_version.pv_major = running_proto.pv_major;
+ conn->cc_version.pv_minor = running_proto.pv_minor;
+ version_to_lvb(&running_proto, lc->oc_lvb);
+ version_lock(conn, DLM_LOCK_PR, DLM_LKF_CONVERT|DLM_LKF_VALBLK);
+ } else if (ret == -EAGAIN) {
+ version_lock(conn, DLM_LOCK_PR, DLM_LKF_VALBLK);
+ ret = lvb_to_version(lc->oc_lvb, &conn->cc_version);
+ if (ret) {
+ rc = ret;
+ user_cluster_disconnect(conn);
+ goto out;
+ }
+ } else {
+ printk(KERN_ERR "ocfs2: Could not determine"
+ " locking version\n");
+ rc = ret;
+ user_cluster_disconnect(conn);
+ goto out;
+ }
+ wait_event(lc->oc_wait, (atomic_read(&lc->oc_this_node) > 0));
+ }
+
/*
* running_proto must have been set before we allowed any mounts
* to proceed.
@@ -961,40 +1027,20 @@ static int user_cluster_connect(struct ocfs2_cluster_connection *conn)
if (fs_protocol_compare(&running_proto, &conn->cc_version)) {
printk(KERN_ERR
"Unable to mount with fs locking protocol version "
- "%u.%u because the userspace control daemon has "
- "negotiated %u.%u\n",
+ "%u.%u because negotiated protocol is %u.%u\n",
conn->cc_version.pv_major, conn->cc_version.pv_minor,
running_proto.pv_major, running_proto.pv_minor);
rc = -EPROTO;
ocfs2_live_connection_drop(lc);
lc = NULL;
- goto out;
- }
-
- rc = dlm_new_lockspace(conn->cc_name, NULL, DLM_LSFL_FS, DLM_LVB_LEN,
- NULL, NULL, NULL, &fsdlm);
- if (rc) {
- ocfs2_live_connection_drop(lc);
- lc = NULL;
- goto out;
}
- conn->cc_private = lc;
- conn->cc_lockspace = fsdlm;
out:
if (rc && lc)
kfree(lc);
return rc;
}
-static int user_cluster_disconnect(struct ocfs2_cluster_connection *conn)
-{
- dlm_release_lockspace(conn->cc_lockspace, 2);
- conn->cc_lockspace = NULL;
- ocfs2_live_connection_drop(conn->cc_private);
- conn->cc_private = NULL;
- return 0;
-}
static int user_cluster_this_node(struct ocfs2_cluster_connection *conn,
unsigned int *this_node)
@@ -1004,8 +1050,11 @@ static int user_cluster_this_node(struct ocfs2_cluster_connection *conn,
if (lc->oc_type == WITH_CONTROLD)
rc = ocfs2_control_get_this_node();
+ else if (lc->oc_type == NO_CONTROLD)
+ rc = atomic_read(&lc->oc_this_node);
else
rc = -EINVAL;
+
if (rc < 0)
return rc;
--
1.8.1.4
--
Goldwyn
next reply other threads:[~2013-10-18 14:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-18 14:46 Goldwyn Rodrigues [this message]
2013-11-04 1:12 ` [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 6/6] Use the new DLM operation callbacks while requesting new lockspace Mark Fasheh
2013-11-04 3:48 ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2013-11-04 22:15 ` Mark Fasheh
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-11-12 14:08 Goldwyn Rodrigues
2013-12-08 19:30 ` Mark Fasheh
2013-12-09 19:42 Goldwyn Rodrigues
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131018144626.GA4598@shrek.lan \
--to=rgoldwyn@suse.de \
--cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.