From: Antonio Quartulli <antonio@meshcoding.com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] netpoll: fix rx_hook() interface by passing the skb
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 12:11:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131022101127.GJ1544@neomailbox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AE90C24D6B3A694183C094C60CF0A2F6026B739B@saturn3.aculab.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 921 bytes --]
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 10:09:00AM +0100, David Laight wrote:
> > Subject: [PATCH net] netpoll: fix rx_hook() interface by passing the skb
> >
> > Right now skb->data is passed to rx_hook() even if the skb
> > has not been linearised and without giving rx_hook() a way
> > to linearise it.
> >
> > Change the rx_hook() interface and make it accept the skb
> > as argument. In this way users implementing rx_hook() can
> > perform all the needed operations to properly (and safely)
> > access the skb data.
> ...
> > - void (*rx_hook)(struct netpoll *, int, char *, int);
> > + void (*rx_hook)(struct netpoll *np, struct sk_buff *skb, int offset);
>
> You can't do that change without changing the way that hooks are registered
> so that any existing modules will fail to register their hooks.
There is no hook registration in the kernel tree. All the users are outside.
--
Antonio Quartulli
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-22 10:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-21 21:31 [PATCH net] netpoll: linearize skb before accessing its data Antonio Quartulli
2013-10-21 22:23 ` David Miller
2013-10-22 6:06 ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-10-22 6:25 ` David Miller
2013-10-22 6:37 ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-10-22 6:50 ` David Miller
2013-10-22 8:48 ` [PATCH net] netpoll: fix rx_hook() interface by passing the skb Antonio Quartulli
2013-10-22 9:09 ` David Laight
2013-10-22 10:11 ` Antonio Quartulli [this message]
2013-10-22 12:46 ` David Laight
2013-10-22 17:13 ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-10-22 19:40 ` David Miller
2013-10-23 8:33 ` David Laight
2013-10-23 10:28 ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-10-23 11:18 ` David Laight
2013-10-23 12:44 ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-10-23 20:16 ` David Miller
2013-10-23 21:36 ` [PATCHv2 " Antonio Quartulli
2013-10-24 8:43 ` David Laight
2013-10-24 12:01 ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-10-24 17:53 ` David Miller
2013-10-25 23:27 ` David Miller
2013-10-21 22:25 ` [PATCH net] netpoll: linearize skb before accessing its data Eric Dumazet
2013-10-21 22:33 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131022101127.GJ1544@neomailbox.net \
--to=antonio@meshcoding.com \
--cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.