From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from top.free-electrons.com ([176.31.233.9] helo=mail.free-electrons.com) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1VYzCK-0007i1-4J for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 14:14:08 +0000 Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 11:13:53 -0300 From: Ezequiel Garcia To: "Gupta, Pekon" Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 10/10] mtd: nand: omap: remove selection of BCH ecc-scheme via KConfig Message-ID: <20131023141352.GG2458@localhost> References: <1382172254-12448-1-git-send-email-pekon@ti.com> <1382172254-12448-11-git-send-email-pekon@ti.com> <20131023134450.GE2458@localhost> <20980858CB6D3A4BAE95CA194937D5E73EA2A130@DBDE04.ent.ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20980858CB6D3A4BAE95CA194937D5E73EA2A130@DBDE04.ent.ti.com> Cc: "mark.rutland@arm.com" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk" , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , "arnd@arndb.de" , "Pawel.Moll@arm.com" , "dedekind1@gmail.com" , "tony@atomide.com" , "avinashphilipk@gmail.com" , "swarren@wwwdotorg.org" , "jp.francois@cynove.com" , "Balbi, Felipe" , "robherring2@gmail.com" , "bcousson@baylibre.com" , "olof@lixom.net" , "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , "ivan.djelic@parrot.com" , "computersforpeace@gmail.com" , "dwmw2@infradead.org" List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Pekon, On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 01:55:58PM +0000, Gupta, Pekon wrote: > > > > I'm wondering how are you testing this in your SOC_AM33XX board (which > > is not ARCH_OMAP3). You probably have ARCH_OMAP3 always selected? > > > Yes, omap2plus_defconfig is a super set.. > arch/arm/configs/omap2plus_defconfig automatically enables ARCH_OMAP3. > Yes, but I always remove what I won't use to reduce build time. And now that you bring this issue. IMHO, the AM33xx family is going to be more and more widely used, so maybe introducing an am33xx_defconfig makes sense. Or is the trend to have the least possible amount of defconfigs? -- Ezequiel García, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering http://free-electrons.com From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ezequiel Garcia Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 10/10] mtd: nand: omap: remove selection of BCH ecc-scheme via KConfig Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 11:13:53 -0300 Message-ID: <20131023141352.GG2458@localhost> References: <1382172254-12448-1-git-send-email-pekon@ti.com> <1382172254-12448-11-git-send-email-pekon@ti.com> <20131023134450.GE2458@localhost> <20980858CB6D3A4BAE95CA194937D5E73EA2A130@DBDE04.ent.ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from top.free-electrons.com ([176.31.233.9]:46325 "EHLO mail.free-electrons.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751161Ab3JWONq (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Oct 2013 10:13:46 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20980858CB6D3A4BAE95CA194937D5E73EA2A130@DBDE04.ent.ti.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: "Gupta, Pekon" Cc: "mark.rutland@arm.com" , "olof@lixom.net" , "computersforpeace@gmail.com" , "dedekind1@gmail.com" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "Pawel.Moll@arm.com" , "arnd@arndb.de" , "swarren@wwwdotorg.org" , "tony@atomide.com" , "jp.francois@cynove.com" , "ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk" , "avinashphilipk@gmail.com" , "Balbi, Felipe" , "robherring2@gmail.com" , "bcousson@baylibre.com" , "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , "ivan.djelic@parrot.com" , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" Pekon, On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 01:55:58PM +0000, Gupta, Pekon wrote: > >=20 > > I'm wondering how are you testing this in your SOC_AM33XX board (wh= ich > > is not ARCH_OMAP3). You probably have ARCH_OMAP3 always selected? > >=20 > Yes, omap2plus_defconfig is a super set.. > arch/arm/configs/omap2plus_defconfig automatically enables ARCH_OMAP3= =2E >=20 Yes, but I always remove what I won't use to reduce build time. And now that you bring this issue. IMHO, the AM33xx family is going to be more and more widely used, so maybe introducing an am33xx_defconf= ig makes sense. Or is the trend to have the least possible amount of defconfigs? --=20 Ezequiel Garc=C3=ADa, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering http://free-electrons.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html