Re: [PATCH 19/19] xfs: convert directory vector functions to constants

From: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 19/19] xfs: convert directory vector functions to constants
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 17:23:52 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131023222352.GT1935@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131017001758.GP4446@dastard>

On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 11:17:58AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 06:06:18PM -0500, Ben Myers wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 05:52:04PM -0500, Ben Myers wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 09:23:17AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 04:16:15PM -0500, Ben Myers wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 09:18:05AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > > > > From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Many of the vectorised function calls now take no parameters and
> > > > > > return a constant value. There is no reason for these to be vectored
> > > > > > functions, so convert them to constants
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Binary sizes:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >    text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
> > > > > >  794490   96802    1096  892388   d9de4 fs/xfs/xfs.o.orig
> > > > > >  792986   96802    1096  890884   d9804 fs/xfs/xfs.o.p1
> > > > > >  792350   96802    1096  890248   d9588 fs/xfs/xfs.o.p2
> > > > > >  789293   96802    1096  887191   d8997 fs/xfs/xfs.o.p3
> > > > > >  789005   96802    1096  886903   d8997 fs/xfs/xfs.o.p4
> > > > > >  789061   96802    1096  886959   d88af fs/xfs/xfs.o.p5
> > > > > >  789733   96802    1096  887631   d8b4f fs/xfs/xfs.o.p6
> > > > > >  791421   96802    1096  889319   d91e7 fs/xfs/xfs.o.p7
> > > > > >  791701   96802    1096  889599   d92ff fs/xfs/xfs.o.p8
> > > > > >  791205   96802    1096  889103   d91cf fs/xfs/xfs.o.p9
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> > > > > 
> > > > > Hmmm.  This one doesn't seem to apply.  Maybe it's just me.
> > > > 
> > > > Applies without mismatch here on an 3.12-rc5 + oss-xfs/master tree
> > > > here. What's the reject that you get?
> > > 
> > > Like so:
> > > 
> > > $ q pu
> > > Applying patch xfs-convert-directory-vector-functions-to-constants.patch
> > > patching file fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.c
> > > patching file fs/xfs/xfs_da_format.c
> > > Hunk #13 FAILED at 571.
> > > Hunk #14 FAILED at 608.
> > > Hunk #15 succeeded at 641 (offset -74 lines).
> > > Hunk #16 FAILED at 729.
> > > Hunk #17 succeeded at 683 (offset -82 lines).
> > > Hunk #18 FAILED at 779.
> > > Hunk #19 succeeded at 728 (offset -87 lines).
> > > Hunk #20 FAILED at 829.
> > > 5 out of 20 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file fs/xfs/xfs_da_format.c
> > > patching file fs/xfs/xfs_dir2.c
> > > patching file fs/xfs/xfs_dir2.h
> > > Hunk #4 FAILED at 92.
> > > 1 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file fs/xfs/xfs_dir2.h
> > > patching file fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_block.c
> > > patching file fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_data.c
> > > patching file fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_leaf.c
> > > patching file fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_node.c
> > > Hunk #1 FAILED at 274.
> > > Hunk #2 succeeded at 1267 (offset -1 lines).
> > > Hunk #3 succeeded at 1299 (offset -1 lines).
> > > Hunk #4 succeeded at 1408 (offset -1 lines).
> > > 1 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_node.c
> > > patching file fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_readdir.c
> > > patching file fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_sf.c
> > > Patch xfs-convert-directory-vector-functions-to-constants.patch does not apply (enforce with -f)
> > > 
> > > That's on 74564fb48.
> > 
> > To be more specific, these are the rejects.  Maybe I missed a patch.
> 
> Looks like you might be missing patch 18 as all the rejects are
> against hunks introduced by that patch.

That was it, thanks.

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs