From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Guangliang Zhao Subject: Re: problem:add acl code to 3.4.66 Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 12:04:32 +0800 Message-ID: <20131024040432.GA3425@x230> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mail-pd0-f170.google.com ([209.85.192.170]:52466 "EHLO mail-pd0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751020Ab3JXEEh (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Oct 2013 00:04:37 -0400 Received: by mail-pd0-f170.google.com with SMTP id v10so1831232pde.1 for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 21:04:36 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: =?utf-8?B?5p2o5rab?= Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 11:37:30AM +0800, =E6=9D=A8=E6=B6=9B wrote: > Hi, Guangliang Zhao >=20 >=20 > Thanks for you great work! > I am adding the acl function for kernel 3.4.66 now. > and find some problems: > 1=E3=80=81I'm not sure which kernel your code is based on, so= can you tell > me the exact version of your kernel. Based on ceph client tree(git://github.com/ceph/ceph-client.git), commit is 53d028160f1affc6c3562e2d07bc352b53d51f2c > 2=E3=80=81I'm almost sure that we are using different kernals= because I've > found some funtions with different parms such as "posix_acl_from_xatt= r" in > acl.c,It's parms are (const void *value, size_t size) in 3.4.66 ,not = like > your code.So do you have any suggestions about my current work? The ACL code is still under reviewing, and I don't have enough time to handle other versions now :-( I think you should wait the final version and backport it. >=20 > I'm a Chinese programer.Thanks again for your help! > Best wishes! >=20 >=20 > Mike --=20 Best regards, Guangliang -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html