From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anthony PERARD Subject: Re: [qemu-upstream-unstable test] 21089: regressions - FAIL Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 14:16:02 +0100 Message-ID: <20131024131601.GI3195@perard.uk.xensource.com> References: <5267CBD7.5020103@m2r.biz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5267CBD7.5020103@m2r.biz> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Fabio Fantoni Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, "xen.org" , Stefano Stabellini List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 03:15:03PM +0200, Fabio Fantoni wrote: > Il 23/10/2013 14:41, xen.org ha scritto: > >flight 21089 qemu-upstream-unstable real [real] > >http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/21089/ > > > >Regressions :-( > > > >Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, > >including tests which could not be run: > > test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intel 7 redhat-install fail REGR. vs. 20054 > > The upstream qemu queue is blocked for a long time. > I've seen a bisect a week ago, are there some news about it? > Thanks for any reply. Yes, I'm working on it. I've being able to reproduce the probleme, but I have still hard time to understand where the issue is. And the bisect is not very helpfull in this case :-(. The issue is only on Intel machine, and seems to be related to Cirrus (or is just one thing that trigger the bug). Using "stdvga=1" works fine... -- Anthony PERARD