From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Serge Hallyn Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] newuidmap, newgidmap: New suid helpers for using subordinate uids and gids Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 21:33:46 -0500 Message-ID: <20131026023346.GA2753@ac100> References: <87d2wxshu0.fsf@xmission.com> <87ehhdpoag.fsf@xmission.com> <20131025203025.GA2467@mail.hallyn.com> <87zjpw278b.fsf@xmission.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87zjpw278b.fsf-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: Linux Containers , Pkg-shadow-devel-XbBxUvOt3X2LieD7tvxI8l/i77bcL1HB@public.gmane.org, "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" , Nicolas =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org Quoting Eric W. Biederman (ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org): > "Serge E. Hallyn" writes: > > > Quoting Eric W. Biederman (ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org): > > > > Hi, > > > >> +static bool verify_range(struct passwd *pw, struct map_range *range) > >> +{ > >> + /* An empty range is invalid */ > >> + if (range->count == 0) > >> + return false; > >> + > >> + /* Test /etc/subuid */ > >> + if (have_sub_uids(pw->pw_name, range->lower, range->count)) > >> + return true; > > > > I think the have_sub_uids() test should be skipped if we started > > out as root. Is there a reason not to do that? > > The only reason I can see for root to use this binary is if it a flavor > of root that has dropped some capbilities. Is there a reason for root > to use newuidmap and newgid map at all? Of course. It keeps things simpler for creating mapped containers. Otherwise we have to special-case the "i am root" vs "i am not root" case when untarring a rootfs for a container. > Otherwise I think it makes sense to enforce whatever the system choosen > policy is on root, because root is opting in. > > Eric > _______________________________________________ > Containers mailing list > Containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers