From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.10]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1VaTEZ-0001ry-Jp for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 16:30:35 +0000 From: Marek Vasut To: Brian Norris Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] mtd: m25p80: fix allocation size Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 17:30:11 +0100 References: <1382583503-13748-1-git-send-email-computersforpeace@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1382583503-13748-1-git-send-email-computersforpeace@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201310271730.12065.marex@denx.de> Cc: sourav.poddar@ti.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Artem Bityutskiy List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi Brian, [...] > @@ -1137,14 +1135,10 @@ static int m25p_probe(struct spi_device *spi) > static int m25p_remove(struct spi_device *spi) > { > struct m25p *flash = spi_get_drvdata(spi); > - int status; > > /* Clean up MTD stuff. */ > - status = mtd_device_unregister(&flash->mtd); > - if (status == 0) { > - kfree(flash->command); > - kfree(flash); > - } > + mtd_device_unregister(&flash->mtd); > + > return 0; > } I wonder if we shouldn't return "status" in here in case mtd_device_unregister() failed. Best regards, Marek Vasut