From: andreas.thalhammer@linux.com
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Topic closed] A Desktop Linux idea: modulized open hardware database for the linux kernel config
Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2013 23:03:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201311032303.16938.andreas.thalhammer@linux.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131103200227.GC7376@thunk.org>
Theodore Ts'o wrote on Sunday, 03rd November 2013:
> It's an idea that people have tossed around before, but utltimately,
> it's far more work than it's worth, and it's a maintenance nightmare.
> For most non-technical users, using a distro kernel is quite good
> enough.
Yes, I get it. Thanks for the honesty.
> > I’m sorry, but I cannot possibly do this all by myself. I was able
> > to help in some Wikis and in Smolt, but I cannot setup such a
> > system. Apparently I was only able to come up with the idea...
>
> If you told me that you wanted to try it, I would tell you that you
> were going to be getting into a huge amount of work, and it's not
> obvious to me that it's worth it --- but if you are going to volunteer
> your own time, then it's ultimately up to you. But having you trying
> to volunteer *other* people's time for what might be a sisyphean does
> take a fair amount of chutzpah.
I don’t want other people to volunteer, I was expressing an idea, but – after
reading your answer – I do understand that the gain is not worth the effort. At
least now I know what you (the people making Linux) think about it.
I was trying to off-load some workload from you (developers) to power-users. I
consider myself to be good enough to compile a kernel by myself, and to
install Gentoo for that matter, and I’m also willing to volunteer some of my
spare time to help other people who run Linux. I wrote some Wiki entries on
how to install Linux on a specific machine and how to get things to run. I
found that most of the times a new kernel was required due to some devices
requireing a staging driver or a deactivated feature of a driver.
However, my possibilities are limited. As I wrote before, I tried some tools
(written by others!) that unfortunately didn’t work out, like Smolt.
So I’ll let go of that idea. I’m certainly glad to have proposed it, but I get
it that it isn’t worth it.
I don’t think it has anything to do with chutzpah though, since the posting
was motivated by me being eager to help where I can, not where I cannot.
(Although I do understand it may look different.)
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-03 22:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-03 14:53 A Desktop Linux idea: modulized open hardware database for the linux kernel config andreas.thalhammer
2013-11-03 16:18 ` Aldo Iljazi
2013-11-03 16:43 ` andreas.thalhammer
2013-11-03 17:42 ` el_es
2013-11-03 18:53 ` andreas.thalhammer
2013-11-03 18:57 ` Re for el_es: " andreas.thalhammer
2013-11-03 20:02 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-11-03 22:03 ` andreas.thalhammer [this message]
2013-11-12 22:13 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201311032303.16938.andreas.thalhammer@linux.com \
--to=andreas.thalhammer@linux.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.