From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jason@lakedaemon.net (Jason Cooper) Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 09:51:51 -0500 Subject: [PATCHv3] ARM: imx: add support code for IMX50 based machines In-Reply-To: <1383524020-1518-1-git-send-email-gerg@uclinux.org> References: <1383524020-1518-1-git-send-email-gerg@uclinux.org> Message-ID: <20131104145151.GD3060@titan.lakedaemon.net> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Greg, On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 10:13:40AM +1000, gerg at uclinux.org wrote: > From: Greg Ungerer > > Add machine support code for the Freescale IMX50 SoC. > > The IMX50 is quite similar to the Freescale IMX53, and contains many of the > same periperhal hardware modules, at the same address offsets as the IMX53. > (Notable exceptions are that the IMX50 contains no CAN bus hardware, less > GPIO, no VPU, it does contain an Electrophoretic display controller though). > > This support code uses some of the IMX53 setup code to reduce duplication > of what would be identical init IO setup. > > Signed-off-by: Greg Ungerer > --- > arch/arm/mach-imx/Makefile | 1 + > arch/arm/mach-imx/common.h | 1 + > arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx50.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx50.c What happened to the rest of the series? If this is a new version of just a single patch in the V2 series (which I suspect it is), we usually make it an in-reply-to the previous version of the patch it replaces. Not a big deal, it just helps us keep track of things more easily. thx, Jason.