From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, kmo@daterainc.com, dm-devel@redhat.com,
agk@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next] dm: fix missing bi_remaining accounting
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 19:56:54 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131105005654.GA22356@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1311041246060.28005@file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com>
On Mon, Nov 04 2013 at 12:49pm -0500,
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 4 Nov 2013, Mike Snitzer wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 04 2013 at 10:25am -0500,
> > Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, 4 Nov 2013, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, Nov 04 2013 at 10:06am -0500,
> > > > Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The code uses atomic_inc for restoration of bi_remaining. This patch
> > > > > changes it to atomic_set(1) to avoid an interlocked instruction. In the
> > > > > target's bi_endio routine we are sure that bi_remaining is zero
> > > > > (otherwise, the bi_endio routine wouldn't be called) and there are no
> > > > > concurrent users of the bio, so we can replace atomic_inc with
> > > > > atomic_set(1).
> > > >
> > > > This isn't DM-specific. Shouldn't the other places in the tree that use
> > > > atomic_inc on bi_remaining should really be converted at the same time?
> > >
> > > There is no 'atomic_inc.*bi_remaining' in other drivers.
> >
> > Wrong. I know btrfs has at least one. As does bcache afaik.
>
> grep -r 'atomic_inc.*bi_remaining' * yilds no hits in btrfs or bcache (on
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git ,
> branch remotes/origin/for-next). It only finds
> drivers/md/dm-cache-target.c, drivers/md/dm-verity.c,
> drivers/md/dm-snap.c, drivers/md/dm-thin.c. Maybe in other git trees there
> are more cases of this.
Here is the btrfs one I was thinking of from Chris:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/3123121/
Should probably make its way into linux-block.git, Jens?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-05 0:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-01 13:59 [PATCH for-next] dm: fix missing bi_remaining accounting Mike Snitzer
2013-11-01 15:03 ` Jens Axboe
2013-11-01 15:43 ` stec skd block driver needs updating for immutable biovec Mike Snitzer
2013-11-01 15:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-11-01 16:02 ` Jens Axboe
2013-11-01 16:28 ` Mike Snitzer
2013-11-01 16:34 ` Jens Axboe
2013-11-01 17:46 ` Mike Snitzer
2013-11-04 11:25 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2013-11-04 15:06 ` [PATCH for-next] dm: fix missing bi_remaining accounting Mikulas Patocka
2013-11-04 15:20 ` Mike Snitzer
2013-11-04 15:25 ` Mikulas Patocka
2013-11-04 16:04 ` Mike Snitzer
2013-11-04 17:49 ` Mikulas Patocka
2013-11-05 0:56 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2013-11-04 20:12 ` Kent Overstreet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131105005654.GA22356@redhat.com \
--to=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=kmo@daterainc.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.