Re: [PATCH 01/10] perf hists: Consolidate __hists__add_*entry()

[Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org>]

Em Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 09:52:43PM +0000, Rodrigo Campos escreveu:
> On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 05:09:52PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > @@ -486,15 +425,15 @@ struct hist_entry *__hists__add_entry(struct hists *hists,
> >  		.stat = {
> > -			.period	= period,
> >  			.nr_events = 1,
> > +			.period	= period,
> >  			.weight = weight,
> >  		},

> Isn't this seems unrelated and unneeded ?

> The "period" field is before the "nr_events" field in the struct, so maybe is
> more clear to leave it as it was ?  The actual relative order (it has some more
> fields) in the struct is: period, weigth, nr_events. Might be better if they
> match that order here ? Although not sure since we are using the fields with
> name and is clear enough.

Yeah, this shouldn't be there, I thought about fixing this up to reduce
the patch size, but ended up being lenient.

Namhyung, please avoid such unneeded patch churn :-)

- Arnaldo