All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: sysfs_bin_mmap lockdep trace.
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 20:10:43 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131113201043.GE13318@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131113184538.GA7269@redhat.com>

On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 01:45:38PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> Al, is this one also known ? Also seen on v3.12-7033-g42a2d923cc34

Umm...  I've seen something like that reported after sysfs merge went in
(right after 3.12), but I hadn't looked into details.

> -> #3 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++++}:

	[sr_block_ioctl() grabs sr_mutex and does copy_from_user() under it]

> -> #2 (sr_mutex){+.+.+.}:
	[sr_block_open() grabs sr_mutex under ->bd_mutex]

> -> #1 (&bdev->bd_mutex){+.+.+.}:
	[sysfs_blk_trace_attr_show() grabs ->bd_mutex and is called under
sysfs_open_file ->mutex]

> -> #0 (&of->mutex){+.+.+.}:
	[sysfs_open_file ->mutex is grabbed by ->mmap()]

Cute...  AFAICS, it came from "sysfs: copy bin mmap support from fs/sysfs/bin.c
to fs/sysfs/file.c".  The first impression is that sysfs_bin_mmap() is
checking for battr->mmap too late, but I'm not sure whether we need of->mutex
to stabilize it...  Tejun, any comments?

  reply	other threads:[~2013-11-13 20:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-13 18:45 sysfs_bin_mmap lockdep trace Dave Jones
2013-11-13 20:10 ` Al Viro [this message]
2013-11-14  5:41   ` Tejun Heo
2013-11-15  1:19     ` Dave Jones
2013-11-17  2:17       ` [PATCH] sysfs: use a separate locking class for open files depending on mmap Tejun Heo
2013-11-17  3:21         ` Dave Jones
2013-11-17  3:29           ` Tejun Heo
2013-11-18  4:45             ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-11-20  6:30               ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131113201043.GE13318@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.