diff for duplicates of <20131118085407.25dadcaf@samsung-9> diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 4a8cb47..87ba15f 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -9,10 +9,18 @@ "ref\020131117141940.GA18569@1wt.eu\0" "ref\020131118112601.65feb708@skate\0" "ref\020131118104448.GI16823@kw.sim.vm.gnt\0" - "From\0stephen@networkplumber.org (Stephen Hemminger)\0" - "Subject\0[BUG,REGRESSION?] 3.11.6+,3.12: GbE iface rate drops to few KB/s\0" + "From\0Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>\0" + "Subject\0Re: [BUG,REGRESSION?] 3.11.6+,3.12: GbE iface rate drops to few KB/s\0" "Date\0Mon, 18 Nov 2013 08:54:07 -0800\0" - "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" + "To\0Simon Guinot <simon.guinot@sequanux.org>\0" + "Cc\0Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>" + Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> + Arnaud Ebalard <arno@natisbad.org> + Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> + edumazet@google.com + linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org + netdev@vger.kernel.org + " Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@gmail.com>\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Mon, 18 Nov 2013 11:44:48 +0100\n" @@ -61,4 +69,4 @@ "But without that patch there was a performance regression for high speed\n" interfaces whihc was caused by TSQ. 10G performance dropped to 8G -17f1be131194593f17f8832b8ffd4a3f478b6a287e45006425492d802c7a9502 +221778a1298aa701d142e39809d1271575248c607e150dd94801368efed93c79
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.