From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-oa0-f54.google.com ([209.85.219.54]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ViQnf-00068M-Oz for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 15:31:44 +0000 Received: by mail-oa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id h16so1304919oag.13 for ; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 07:31:21 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 15:31:10 +0000 From: Lee Jones To: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] mtd: st_spi_fsm: Supply all register address and bit logic defines Message-ID: <20131118153110.GN13640@lee--X1> References: <1384438956-31153-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <1384438956-31153-3-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <20131118093229.GB13640@lee--X1> <20131118133940.GC14306@sirena.org.uk> <20131118142447.GJ13640@lee--X1> <20131118144512.GB24408@sirena.org.uk> <20131118145614.GM13640@lee--X1> <20131118151651.GE24408@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20131118151651.GE24408@sirena.org.uk> Cc: angus.clark@st.com, Linus Walleij , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , David Woodhouse , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 18 Nov 2013, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 02:56:14PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > > > I think it's a good idea for people using the m25p80, but still > > doesn't effect us. All of our chips are dynamically probable. We are > > This doesn't seem realistic, you're assuming that system integrators > won't go and use chips you've not heard of and at least in the case of > things like quad read my understanding is that the commands aren't > standardised so the host just has to know what to write. I'm not following? What are you suggesting? After some analysis we have come to the conclusion that using m25p80 is not feasible. It makes more sense for this to be an orthogonal/stand-alone driver. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones) Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 15:31:10 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 02/10] mtd: st_spi_fsm: Supply all register address and bit logic defines In-Reply-To: <20131118151651.GE24408@sirena.org.uk> References: <1384438956-31153-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <1384438956-31153-3-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <20131118093229.GB13640@lee--X1> <20131118133940.GC14306@sirena.org.uk> <20131118142447.GJ13640@lee--X1> <20131118144512.GB24408@sirena.org.uk> <20131118145614.GM13640@lee--X1> <20131118151651.GE24408@sirena.org.uk> Message-ID: <20131118153110.GN13640@lee--X1> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, 18 Nov 2013, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 02:56:14PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > > > I think it's a good idea for people using the m25p80, but still > > doesn't effect us. All of our chips are dynamically probable. We are > > This doesn't seem realistic, you're assuming that system integrators > won't go and use chips you've not heard of and at least in the case of > things like quad read my understanding is that the commands aren't > standardised so the host just has to know what to write. I'm not following? What are you suggesting? After some analysis we have come to the conclusion that using m25p80 is not feasible. It makes more sense for this to be an orthogonal/stand-alone driver. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751896Ab3KRPb3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Nov 2013 10:31:29 -0500 Received: from mail-oa0-f44.google.com ([209.85.219.44]:37685 "EHLO mail-oa0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751167Ab3KRPbU (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Nov 2013 10:31:20 -0500 Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 15:31:10 +0000 From: Lee Jones To: Mark Brown Cc: Linus Walleij , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , David Woodhouse , "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , angus.clark@st.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] mtd: st_spi_fsm: Supply all register address and bit logic defines Message-ID: <20131118153110.GN13640@lee--X1> References: <1384438956-31153-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <1384438956-31153-3-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <20131118093229.GB13640@lee--X1> <20131118133940.GC14306@sirena.org.uk> <20131118142447.GJ13640@lee--X1> <20131118144512.GB24408@sirena.org.uk> <20131118145614.GM13640@lee--X1> <20131118151651.GE24408@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20131118151651.GE24408@sirena.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 18 Nov 2013, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 02:56:14PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > > > I think it's a good idea for people using the m25p80, but still > > doesn't effect us. All of our chips are dynamically probable. We are > > This doesn't seem realistic, you're assuming that system integrators > won't go and use chips you've not heard of and at least in the case of > things like quad read my understanding is that the commands aren't > standardised so the host just has to know what to write. I'm not following? What are you suggesting? After some analysis we have come to the conclusion that using m25p80 is not feasible. It makes more sense for this to be an orthogonal/stand-alone driver. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog