From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] neigh: Force garbage collection if an entry is deleted administratively
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 12:54:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131119115414.GZ31491@secunet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131118.162115.407611651189468804.davem@davemloft.net>
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 04:21:15PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
>
> I think the main issue is that after this patch, the problem is really
> still there.
>
> Let's say some device holds onto the neigh for a long time, then during
> this time an administrative replacement will still get that -EEXIST
> failure.
Well, I think we had this problem even before we stopped to do
cyclic garbage collecting. This patch would just restore the
behaviour we had before this change.
>
> My conclusion is that the management of the state is the problem.
> Specifically, if we invalidate an entry then we should remove it's
> visisbility. This means the table should operate by unhashing the
> entry unconditionally during such operations.
>
> If some stray references exist, that's fine, the entity holding the
> reference will perform the final neigh cleanup at release time.
>
> Does this make sense to you?
Yes, makes sense :-)
I'm not sure how invasive this will be, so maybe we should do
one patch to restore the old behaviour (for net) and one on
top of this to improve the situation as you described
(for net-next).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-19 11:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-12 8:57 [PATCH net] neigh: Force garbage collection if an entry is deleted administratively Steffen Klassert
2013-11-14 7:23 ` David Miller
2013-11-18 10:08 ` Steffen Klassert
2013-11-18 21:21 ` David Miller
2013-11-19 11:54 ` Steffen Klassert [this message]
2013-11-19 12:08 ` David Laight
2013-11-19 12:41 ` Steffen Klassert
2013-11-21 19:18 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131119115414.GZ31491@secunet.com \
--to=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.