From: Gavin Shan <shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Gavin Shan <shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/eeh: Dump PHB3 diag-data on frozen PE
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 18:09:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131120100927.GA2546@shangw.(null)> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1384940328.26969.88.camel@pasglop>
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 08:38:48PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>On Wed, 2013-11-20 at 17:36 +0800, Gavin Shan wrote:
>> While we detect frozen PE on PHB3, it's always meaningful to have
>> the dumped diag-data for further diagnosis and analysis.
>
>Don't we trip that during PCI probing ? For example if we probe behind
>a PCI-X bridge (which can exist on an adapter) we'll trip EEH on every
>non-existing device won't we ?
>
Yes, we already had the dumped PHB diag-data when detecting frozen PE
during PCI probing. After PCI probing is completed, the EEH takes over
and we won't dump PHB diag-data during PCI config cycles.
Took a close look on what we have in the code. Those functions to dump
PHB (P7IOC & PHB3) needs a bit rework or refactoring since we're dumping
same PHB diag-data in pci.c and eeh-ioda.c at the same time.
Besides, I think the appropriate place to dump PHB diag-data (for EEH
core itself) would be ioda_eeh_get_log(), which is the indirect backend
of eeh_ops::get_log, instead of the function ioda_eeh_next_error().
Ben, please drop this one for now and I'll send the revised one :-)
Thanks,
Gavin
>> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-ioda.c | 3 +++
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-ioda.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-ioda.c
>> index 02245ce..481528d 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-ioda.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-ioda.c
>> @@ -994,8 +994,11 @@ static int ioda_eeh_next_error(struct eeh_pe **pe)
>> if (ioda_eeh_get_pe(hose, frozen_pe_no, pe))
>> break;
>>
>> + /* It would be always indicative to have PHB diag-data */
>> pr_err("EEH: Frozen PE#%x on PHB#%x detected\n",
>> (*pe)->addr, (*pe)->phb->global_number);
>> + ioda_eeh_phb_diag(hose);
>> +
>> ret = 1;
>> goto out;
>> }
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-20 10:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-20 9:36 [PATCH] powerpc/eeh: Dump PHB3 diag-data on frozen PE Gavin Shan
2013-11-20 9:38 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-11-20 10:09 ` Gavin Shan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='20131120100927.GA2546@shangw.(null)' \
--to=shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.