All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Fw: [Bug 65261] New: Packet loss or excessive packet delay repeatedly for some seconds
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 12:23:16 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131120122316.77ce76c5@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> (raw)



Begin forwarded message:

Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 05:57:59 -0800
From: "bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org" <bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org>
To: "stephen@networkplumber.org" <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Subject: [Bug 65261] New: Packet loss or excessive packet delay repeatedly for some seconds


https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65261

            Bug ID: 65261
           Summary: Packet loss or excessive packet delay repeatedly for
                    some seconds
           Product: Networking
           Version: 2.5
    Kernel Version: 3.10.19
          Hardware: x86-64
                OS: Linux
              Tree: Mainline
            Status: NEW
          Severity: high
          Priority: P1
         Component: IPV4
          Assignee: shemminger@linux-foundation.org
          Reporter: arno@wagner.name
        Regression: No

Created attachment 115261
  --> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=115261&action=edit
Kernel config 3.10.19

I recently upgraded my development-server/firewall/NAT-box from 3.10.17 to
3.10.19. Since then I noticed increased DNS lookup failures on a connected
Windows box and occasional slow updates on putty-SSH logins when scrolling in
an editor (joe, takes something like an estimated 100-300ms for screen
updates). These update delays are repeatable for something like 10-20 seconds
or more, e.g. inserting a line and then deleting again, then vanish. The delays
make remote editing hard to do when they happen. The DNS lookup failures are
really annoying. 

I have not found a way to reliably trigger the problem.

Going back to 3.10.17 fixed the issue as far as I can tell. (Several hours
editing source code without it showing up.) The only change between the two
configurations was that I added the scsi CDROM driver (which should not be able
to cause this?).

The network connection has an iptables "all pass" on the server side for the
affected connection. The client side is a Win7 machine. The network link is GbE
with 2 Switches in there. No packet loss on ping/ping -f. Network hardware is 
Intel 82574L Gigabit card on both sides.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

             reply	other threads:[~2013-11-20 20:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-20 20:23 Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2013-11-23  4:33 ` Fw: [Bug 65261] New: Packet loss or excessive packet delay repeatedly for some seconds Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-11-23 12:11   ` Arno Wagner
2013-11-23 16:45     ` Ben Hutchings
2013-11-23 20:20       ` Arno Wagner
2013-11-23 20:31         ` Ben Hutchings
2013-11-23 20:39         ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-11-23 22:00           ` Arno Wagner
2013-11-23 22:17             ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-11-23 22:11           ` Re2: " Arno Wagner
2013-11-23 22:18             ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-11-23 23:01               ` Arno Wagner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131120122316.77ce76c5@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.