From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: w@1wt.eu (Willy Tarreau) Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 19:29:19 +0100 Subject: [BUG,REGRESSION?] 3.11.6+,3.12: GbE iface rate drops to few KB/s In-Reply-To: <1384971684.10637.22.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> References: <20131112100126.GB23981@1wt.eu> <87vbzxd473.fsf@natisbad.org> <20131113072257.GB10591@1wt.eu> <20131117141940.GA18569@1wt.eu> <1384710098.8604.58.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> <20131120171227.GG8581@1wt.eu> <20131120173436.GK8581@1wt.eu> <1384969222.10637.20.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> <20131120181532.GM8581@1wt.eu> <1384971684.10637.22.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> Message-ID: <20131120182919.GO8581@1wt.eu> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:21:24AM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote: > On Wed, 2013-11-20 at 19:15 +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > > No, I was on latest stable (3.10.19) which exhibits the regression but does > > not yet have your fix above. Then I tested the patch your proposed in this > > thread, then this latest one. Since the patch is not yet even in Linus' > > tree, I'm not sure Arnaud has tried it yet. > > Oh right ;) > > BTW Linus tree has the fix, I just checked this now. > > (Linus got David changes 19 hours ago) Ah yes I didn't look far enough back. Thanks, Willy From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Willy Tarreau Subject: Re: [BUG,REGRESSION?] 3.11.6+,3.12: GbE iface rate drops to few KB/s Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 19:29:19 +0100 Message-ID: <20131120182919.GO8581@1wt.eu> References: <20131112100126.GB23981@1wt.eu> <87vbzxd473.fsf@natisbad.org> <20131113072257.GB10591@1wt.eu> <20131117141940.GA18569@1wt.eu> <1384710098.8604.58.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> <20131120171227.GG8581@1wt.eu> <20131120173436.GK8581@1wt.eu> <1384969222.10637.20.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> <20131120181532.GM8581@1wt.eu> <1384971684.10637.22.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Thomas Petazzoni , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Arnaud Ebalard , edumazet@google.com, Cong Wang , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org To: Eric Dumazet Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1384971684.10637.22.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:21:24AM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote: > On Wed, 2013-11-20 at 19:15 +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > > No, I was on latest stable (3.10.19) which exhibits the regression but does > > not yet have your fix above. Then I tested the patch your proposed in this > > thread, then this latest one. Since the patch is not yet even in Linus' > > tree, I'm not sure Arnaud has tried it yet. > > Oh right ;) > > BTW Linus tree has the fix, I just checked this now. > > (Linus got David changes 19 hours ago) Ah yes I didn't look far enough back. Thanks, Willy