From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Thu, 21 Nov 2013 23:43:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]:34789 "EHLO linux-mips.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S6826005Ab3KUWnDoDWTC (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Nov 2013 23:43:03 +0100 Received: from scotty.linux-mips.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by scotty.linux-mips.net (8.14.7/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rALMh2bO031862; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 23:43:02 +0100 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by scotty.linux-mips.net (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id rALMh1YP031861; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 23:43:01 +0100 Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 23:43:01 +0100 From: Ralf Baechle To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" Cc: Paul Burton , "linux-mips@linux-mips.org" Subject: Re: R2300 (not the hay baler) Message-ID: <20131121224301.GY10382@linux-mips.org> References: <528B466A.3050906@imgtec.com> <528B60B3.6030406@imgtec.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 38570 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: linux-mips X-List-ID: linux-mips List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-mips On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 07:52:04PM +0000, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > I think the discussion was off-list (Ralf, would you mind if I digged up > any clues from there?). Please go ahead. > The format has been set long ago, and is also odd > enough to have 32 64-bit slots in the PTRACE_GETFPREGS/PTRACE_SETFPREGS > structure even for o32 processes (that now should be unexpectedly helpful > for FP64 o32 processes though), so there's little sense discussing its > prettiness or ugliness at this point in the game. > > Also I'm not sure what the core file format is for the FP context, it may > be worth double-checking too. Is there some test suite for that kind of stuff? > Please feel free to poke me directly if you have any further issues about > MIPS I ISA compatibility. Makes me wonder if there's a MIPS emulator that emulates a MIPS I system faithfully. Ralf