From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
Rhyland Klein <rklein@nvidia.com>,
Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>,
Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] mmc: sdhci-acpi: covert to use GPIO descriptor API
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 12:18:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131122101803.GG2281@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <528F1B7E.7010601@intel.com>
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 10:53:18AM +0200, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 21/11/13 16:45, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > The new descriptor based GPIO interface is now the recommend and more safer
>
> "recommend and more safer" -> "recommended and safer"
OK.
>
> > way of using GPIOs from device drivers. Convert the ACPI SDHCI driver to
> > use that interface.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c | 26 ++++++++++----------------
> > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c
> > index ef19874fcd1f..379ddfe14bc7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c
> > @@ -31,10 +31,9 @@
> > #include <linux/bitops.h>
> > #include <linux/types.h>
> > #include <linux/err.h>
> > -#include <linux/gpio.h>
> > +#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> > #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> > #include <linux/acpi.h>
> > -#include <linux/acpi_gpio.h>
> > #include <linux/pm.h>
> > #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> > #include <linux/delay.h>
> > @@ -199,22 +198,19 @@ static irqreturn_t sdhci_acpi_sd_cd(int irq, void *dev_id)
> > return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > }
> >
> > -static int sdhci_acpi_add_own_cd(struct device *dev, int gpio,
> > - struct mmc_host *mmc)
> > +static int sdhci_acpi_add_own_cd(struct device *dev, struct mmc_host *mmc)
> > {
> > + struct gpio_desc *desc;
> > unsigned long flags;
> > int err, irq;
> >
> > - if (gpio < 0) {
> > - err = gpio;
> > + desc = devm_gpiod_get_index(dev, NULL, 0);
>
> I notice that:
>
> devm_gpio_request_one(.., label)
> -> gpio_request_one(..., label)
> -> gpiod_request(..., label)
>
> but:
>
> devm_gpiod_get_index(..., con_id, ...)
> -> gpiod_get_index(..., con_id, ...)
> -> gpiod_request(..., con_id)
>
> which suggests that 'con_id' is equivalent to 'label'.
> i.e. "sd_cd". Is it?
Indeed, it is. Even though ACPI doesn't use con_id for lookup gpiolib uses
it as a label once the GPIO descriptor is found.
I'll change that from NULL to "sd_cd".
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-22 10:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-21 14:45 [PATCH 0/5] gpio / ACPI: convert users to gpiod_* and drop acpi_gpio.h Mika Westerberg
2013-11-21 14:45 ` [PATCH 1/5] net: rfkill: gpio: convert to descriptor-based GPIO interface Mika Westerberg
2013-11-21 15:24 ` Heikki Krogerus
2013-11-21 17:05 ` Rhyland Klein
2013-11-21 17:22 ` Mika Westerberg
2013-11-21 21:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-11-21 15:32 ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-11-22 10:50 ` Heikki Krogerus
2013-11-21 14:45 ` [PATCH 2/5] mmc: sdhci-acpi: covert to use GPIO descriptor API Mika Westerberg
2013-11-22 8:53 ` Adrian Hunter
2013-11-22 10:18 ` Mika Westerberg [this message]
2013-11-21 14:45 ` [PATCH 3/5] gpio / ACPI: register to ACPI events automatically Mika Westerberg
2013-11-21 14:45 ` [PATCH 4/5] gpio / ACPI: get rid of acpi_gpio.h Mika Westerberg
2013-11-21 14:45 ` [PATCH 5/5] Documentation / ACPI: update to GPIO descriptor API Mika Westerberg
2013-11-21 15:01 ` [PATCH 0/5] gpio / ACPI: convert users to gpiod_* and drop acpi_gpio.h Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131122101803.GG2281@intel.com \
--to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=acourbot@nvidia.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=rklein@nvidia.com \
--cc=rob@landley.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.