Re: FEC performance degradation on iMX28 with forced link media

[Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>]

Hi Hector,

> Hello,
> 
> When forcing the Ethernet PHY link media with ethtool/mii-tool on the
> i.MX28 I've seen important performance degradation as the packet size
> increases.
> 
> On the target:
> # mii-tool eth0 -F 10baseT-FD
> # netpipe
> 
> On the host:
> # netpipe -h <target-ip> -n 1
> ...
> 44:    1024 bytes      1 times -->      6.56 Mbps in    1191.00 usec
> 45:    1027 bytes      1 times -->      6.56 Mbps in    1193.52 usec
> 46:    1533 bytes      1 times -->      0.60 Mbps in   19600.54 usec
> 47:    1536 bytes      1 times -->      0.46 Mbps in   25262.52 usec
> 48:    1539 bytes      1 times -->      0.57 Mbps in   20745.54 usec
> 49:    2045 bytes      1 times -->      0.74 Mbps in   20971.95 usec
> ...
> On loop 46, as the packet size exceeds the MTU (1500) performance falls
> from 6.56Mbps to 0.60Mbps.
> 
> Going back to 100baseTX-FD, but still forced (autonegotiation off), the
> same occurs: On the target:
> # mii-tool eth0 -F 100baseTx-FD
> # netpipe
> 
> On the host:
> # netpipe -h <target-ip> -n 1
> ...
> 58:    6141 bytes      1 times -->     39.74 Mbps in    1179.03 usec
> 59:    6144 bytes      1 times -->     41.83 Mbps in    1120.51 usec
> 60:    6147 bytes      1 times -->     41.39 Mbps in    1133.03 usec
> 61:    8189 bytes      1 times -->      6.36 Mbps in    9823.94 usec
> 62:    8192 bytes      1 times -->      6.56 Mbps in    9521.46 usec
> 63:    8195 bytes      1 times -->      6.56 Mbps in    9532.99 usec
> ...
> only this time it happens with a larger packet size (8189 bytes).
> 
> With autonegotiation on, performance is ok and does not suffer these drops.
> 
> I've reproduced this on the mx28evk board but it also happens in my
> hardware, with different PHY on v3.10.
> I also tried on an old v2.6.35 kernel and the issue was reproducible as
> well, though it happened with larger packet sizes than it happens with
> v3.10:
> ...
> 75:   32771 bytes      1 times -->     49.64 Mbps in    5036.50 usec
> 76:   49149 bytes      1 times -->     46.18 Mbps in    8120.48 usec
> 77:   49152 bytes      1 times -->     43.30 Mbps in    8660.46 usec
> 78:   49155 bytes      1 times -->     40.10 Mbps in    9351.46 usec
> 79:   65533 bytes      1 times -->      2.03 Mbps in  246061.04 usec
> 80:   65536 bytes      1 times -->      2.21 Mbps in  226516.50 usec
> 81:   65539 bytes      1 times -->      1.45 Mbps in  344196.46 usec
> ...
> 
> Could there be any issue with packet fragmentation?
> I tried the same on imx6sabresd but here the issue is not reproducible. I
> don't know if the higher CPU frequency might be hiding the problem,
> though.
> 
> Any idea about what can make the difference between forcing media vs
> autonegotiation?

Let me ask, this might be unrelated, but I will still go ahead. Do you also 
observe packetloss? You can check with iperf:

On host machine (PC): iperf -u -s -l 4M -i 60
On target: iperf -u -c <hostip> -t 3600 -B 100M -i 60

Best regards,
Marek Vasut