From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi: Add BayTrail SoC GPIO and LPSS ACPI IDs Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 01:03:48 +0000 Message-ID: <20131126010348.GA29198@srcf.ucam.org> References: <1385417755-21776-1-git-send-email-paul.drews@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([93.93.128.6]:35044 "EHLO cavan.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752054Ab3KZBEE (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Nov 2013 20:04:04 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1385417755-21776-1-git-send-email-paul.drews@intel.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Paul Drews Cc: lenb@kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, linus.walleij@linaro.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 02:15:55PM -0800, Paul Drews wrote: > This adds the new ACPI ID (INT33FC) for the BayTrail GPIO > banks as seen on a BayTrail M System-On-Chip platform. This > ACPI ID is used by the BayTrail GPIO (pinctrl) driver to > manage the Low Power Subsystem (LPSS). Not that we can do anything about this now, but if they have the same programming model why isn't there a CID that covers them? -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org