Re: [PATCH net] af_packet: use spin_lock_bh() for sk_buff_head

[Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>]

On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 08:17:55AM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>On Wed, 2013-11-27 at 13:57 +0100, Veaceslav Falico wrote:
>> While running a debug kernel, a warning of inconsistent lock state showed
>> up for sk->sk_receive_queue->lock between packet_set_ring() (actually,
>> static prb_shutdown_retire_blk_timer(), which does spin_lock()) and
>> sock_queue_rcv_skb(), which does spin_lock_irqsave().
>>
>> Fix this by converting the spin_lock() used in
>> prb_shutdown_retire_blk_timer() to spin_lock_bh(), as it is used in
>> packet_set_ring().
>
>Patch is good, but description is slightly misleading.

Yep, thank you, will reword and resubmit.

>
>Problem is not because sock_queue_rcv_skb() uses spin_lock_irqsave().
>
>Problem is prb_retire_rx_blk_timer_expired() is called from softirq
>context.
>
>So if we do not block BH in prb_shutdown_retire_blk_timer() :
>
>spin_lock(&rb_queue->lock);
>pkc->delete_blk_timer = 1;
>spin_unlock(&rb_queue->lock);
>
>Timer could fire right in the middle and would spin forever trying
>to acquire the same lock.
>
>Using spin_lock_bh() prevents timer being fired on this cpu.
>
>Thanks !
>
>