From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [PATCH] UEFI: Don't use UEFI time services on 32-bit Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 23:30:01 +0100 Message-ID: <20131129223001.GE4262@pd.tnic> References: <1385754283-2464-1-git-send-email-matthew.garrett@nebula.com> <1385762647.3539.4.camel@linux-s257.site> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1385762647.3539.4.camel-ONCj+Eqt86TasUa73XJKwA@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-efi-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: joeyli Cc: Matthew Garrett , matt.fleming-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, stable-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, Borislav Petkov List-Id: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 06:04:07AM +0800, joeyli wrote: > I am sure his patchset can walkaround physical address accessing issue > on a broken 64-bit machine. But, I didn't test it on 32-bit issue > machine. Yeah, my patches don't change 32-bit so I wouldn't expect any difference, unfortunately. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. --