From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joel Becker Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 07:38:52 +0000 Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] Remove versioning information In-Reply-To: <20131203000635.GC16774@wotan.suse.de> References: <20131126233722.GA20032@shrek.lan> <20131203000635.GC16774@wotan.suse.de> Message-ID: <20131203073852.GB7047@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 04:06:35PM -0800, Mark Fasheh wrote: > On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 05:37:27PM -0600, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote: > > The versioning information is confusing for end-users. The numbers > > are stuck at 1.5.0 while the tools version have moved to 1.8.2. > > > > I suggest removing the versioning system in the ocfs2 module and let > > the kernel version be the guide to debug issues. However, if > > you think versioning is still required, please state the reason and > > modify the version string in the *ver.h files. > > Thanks for this. Once upon a time the versioning helped us but these days > it's just outdated info > > I would keep the module description if you don't mind. Something short and > straight forward: > > MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Ocfs2 cluster file system"); > > I don't know that we really need a description for the other two modules. I also agree we should remove the versions. However, we should retain descriptions for all of them. Joel > --Mark > > -- > Mark Fasheh > > _______________________________________________ > Ocfs2-devel mailing list > Ocfs2-devel at oss.oracle.com > https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel --