From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lee Jones Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: ux500_pcm: Differentiate between pdata and DT initialisation Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 12:04:20 +0000 Message-ID: <20131203120420.GC12031@lee--X1> References: <1386066427-6862-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <529DC6BE.3080607@metafoo.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <529DC6BE.3080607@metafoo.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Lars-Peter Clausen Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, broonie@kernel.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Tue, 03 Dec 2013, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > On 12/03/2013 11:27 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > > If booting with full DT support (i.e. DMA too, the last piece of th= e > > puzzle), then we don't need to use the compatible_request_channel c= all > > back or require some of the historical bumph which probably isn't > > required by a platform data start-up now either. This will also be > > ripped out in upcoming commits. > >=20 > > Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org > > Acked-by: Linus Walleij > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones >=20 > Strictly speaking you do not need the second config, but well conside= ring > that this will all hopefully be removed soon anyway it should be fine= =2E That's true it will, but why don't we need the second config? I won't want the compat function to be called in the DT case. > Reviewed-by: Lars-Peter Clausen Thanks. --=20 Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org =E2=94=82 Open source software for ARM SoCs =46ollow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones) Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 12:04:20 +0000 Subject: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: ux500_pcm: Differentiate between pdata and DT initialisation In-Reply-To: <529DC6BE.3080607@metafoo.de> References: <1386066427-6862-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <529DC6BE.3080607@metafoo.de> Message-ID: <20131203120420.GC12031@lee--X1> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, 03 Dec 2013, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > On 12/03/2013 11:27 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > > If booting with full DT support (i.e. DMA too, the last piece of the > > puzzle), then we don't need to use the compatible_request_channel call > > back or require some of the historical bumph which probably isn't > > required by a platform data start-up now either. This will also be > > ripped out in upcoming commits. > > > > Cc: alsa-devel at alsa-project.org > > Acked-by: Linus Walleij > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones > > Strictly speaking you do not need the second config, but well considering > that this will all hopefully be removed soon anyway it should be fine. That's true it will, but why don't we need the second config? I won't want the compat function to be called in the DT case. > Reviewed-by: Lars-Peter Clausen Thanks. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog