From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@chromium.org>,
"Ma, Xindong" <xindong.ma@intel.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>, Sameer Nanda <snanda@chromium.org>,
Sergey Dyasly <dserrg@gmail.com>,
"Tu, Xiaobing" <xiaobing.tu@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/4] initial while_each_thread() fixes
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 14:03:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131204130351.GA5984@redhat.com> (raw)
Hello.
Changes: split the change in mm/oom_kill.c + update the comment above
has_intersects_mems_allowed().
Sergey, Sameer, the resulting code is the same after 1-3, I preserved
your acks.
4/4 is new.
Andrew, just in case, 3/4 and 4/4 try to fix the unrelated bugs, this
has nothing to do with while_each_thread/for_each_thread changes.
To remind, this is the first series which changes the callers of the
buggy while_each_thread(), I'll send more.
Oleg.
include/linux/init_task.h | 2 +
include/linux/sched.h | 12 ++++++++++
kernel/exit.c | 1 +
kernel/fork.c | 7 ++++++
mm/oom_kill.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
5 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
next reply other threads:[~2013-12-04 13:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-04 13:03 Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2013-12-04 13:04 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] introduce for_each_thread() to replace the buggy while_each_thread() Oleg Nesterov
2013-12-04 13:28 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-04 13:49 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-12-04 14:17 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-04 15:27 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-12-05 0:58 ` David Rientjes
2013-12-05 18:16 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-12-05 23:23 ` David Rientjes
2013-12-04 13:04 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] oom_kill: change oom_kill.c to use for_each_thread() Oleg Nesterov
2013-12-04 15:37 ` Michal Hocko
2013-12-05 0:39 ` David Rientjes
2013-12-04 13:04 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] oom_kill: has_intersects_mems_allowed() needs rcu_read_lock() Oleg Nesterov
2013-12-04 15:37 ` Michal Hocko
2013-12-05 0:41 ` David Rientjes
2013-12-04 13:04 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] oom_kill: add rcu_read_lock() into find_lock_task_mm() Oleg Nesterov
2013-12-04 15:40 ` Michal Hocko
2013-12-05 0:42 ` David Rientjes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131204130351.GA5984@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dserrg@gmail.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=msb@chromium.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=snanda@chromium.org \
--cc=xiaobing.tu@intel.com \
--cc=xindong.ma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.