From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olaf Hering Subject: Re: Xen 4.4 development update: RC0 imminent Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 18:01:05 +0100 Message-ID: <20131205170105.GA12679@aepfle.de> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1VocIW-0005nM-Cd for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2013 17:01:08 +0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: George Dunlap Cc: xen-devel , David Vrabel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Because its almost Friday: On Thu, Dec 05, George Dunlap wrote: > * kexec -- is this worth testing? Its at least worth noting what this is all about ;-) kexec Xen? kexec dom0? kexec PV? kexec PVH? kexec PVonHVM? kexec HVM? At least the latter should already work without changes. Olaf