All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] extent list locking fixes V2
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 11:37:29 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131206173729.GR1935@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131206164819.371654241@bombadil.infradead.org>

Hey Christoph,

On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 08:48:19AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Fixed the review feedback, and includes Bens original patch for completeness.

I ran your initial series overnight with xfstests... oddly I hit this:

[16304.656687] XFS: Assertion failed: xfs_isilocked(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL), file: /root/xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_inode_fork.c, line: 434
[16304.668925] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[16304.674098] kernel BUG at /root/xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_message.c:107!
[16304.674102] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
[16304.674151] Modules linked in: xfs(OF) ext2(F) dm_flakey(F) crc32c(F) libcrc32c(F) autofs4(F) cpufreq_conservative(F) cpufreq_userspace(F) cpufreq_powersave(F) microcode(F) fuse(F) loop(F) dm_mod(F) joydev(F) hid_generic(F) usbhid(F) hid(F) ehci_pci(F) ehci_hcd(F) iTCO_wdt(F) sg(F) igb(F) iTCO_vendor_support(F) isci(F) ipv6(F) ptp(F) usbcore(F) ioatdma(F) libsas(F) lpc_ich(F) pcspkr(F) i2c_i801(F) sr_mod(F) mptctl(F) pps_core(F) usb_common(F) mfd_core(F) dca(F) cdrom(F) wmi(F) rtc_cmos(F) acpi_cpufreq(F) button(F) mgag200(F) ttm(F) drm_kms_helper(F) drm(F) i2c_algo_bit(F) sysimgblt(F) sysfillrect(F) i2c_core(F) syscopyarea(F) sd_mod(F) crc_t10dif(F) crct10dif_common(F) mpt2sas(F)
raid_class(F) scsi_dh_emc(F) scsi_dh_rdac(F) scsi_dh_alua(F) scsi_dh_hp_sw(F) scsi_dh(F) thermal(F) sata_nv(F) processor(F) piix(F) mptsas(F) mptscsih(F) scsi_transport_sas(F) mptbase(F) megaraid_sas(F) ide_generic(F) ide_core(F) fan(F) thermal_sys(F) hwmon(F) ext3(F) jbd(F) mbcache(F) edd(F) ata_piix(F) ahci(F) libahci(F) libata(F) scsi_mod(F) [last unloaded: scsi_debug]
[16304.674172] CPU: 13 PID: 12264 Comm: fsstress Tainted: GF         IO 3.13.0-rc2-0.9-default #28
[16304.674175] Hardware name: SGI.COM SUMMIT/S2600GZ, BIOS SE5C600.86B.01.06.0002.110120121539 11/01/2012
[16304.674183] task: ffff8807fd76c190 ti: ffff88082d02e000 task.ti: ffff88082d02e000
[16304.674231] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa072e2ed>]  [<ffffffffa072e2ed>] assfail+0x1d/0x30 [xfs]
[16304.674233] RSP: 0018:ffff88082d02f9d8  EFLAGS: 00010296
[16304.674235] RAX: 000000000000006c RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 0000000000000000
[16304.674236] RDX: ffff88043faeed68 RSI: ffff88043faed248 RDI: ffff88043faed248
[16304.674238] RBP: ffff88082d02f9d8 R08: 0000000000001a0c R09: 000000000000000d
[16304.674239] R10: 0000000000001a0c R11: 0000000000000006 R12: ffff88042a7eb800
[16304.674240] R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffff88082d02fb54 R15: 0000000000000000
[16304.674243] FS:  00007fda2ff4d700(0000) GS:ffff88043fae0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[16304.674245] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[16304.674246] CR2: 00007fda2f4a4b80 CR3: 000000082bf5e000 CR4: 00000000000407e0
[16304.674247] Stack:
[16304.674254]  ffff88082d02fa18 ffffffffa077c4fe ffff88043ffd9d80 0000000000000001
[16304.674258]  ffff88042a7eb800 ffff88042cd694f0 ffff88082d02fb54 0000000000000004
[16304.674263]  ffff88082d02fad8 ffffffffa07471f4 0000000000000000 000000012d6ca940
[16304.674263] Call Trace:
[16304.674308]  [<ffffffffa077c4fe>] xfs_iread_extents+0x4e/0x190 [xfs]
[16304.674346]  [<ffffffffa07471f4>] xfs_bmapi_read+0x264/0x3f0 [xfs]
[16304.674383]  [<ffffffffa075e601>] xfs_dabuf_map+0x281/0x300 [xfs]
[16304.674418]  [<ffffffffa075e789>] xfs_da_read_buf+0x59/0x2d0 [xfs]
[16304.674427]  [<ffffffff81160a55>] ? kmem_getpages+0xc5/0x170
[16304.674431]  [<ffffffff81161cf1>] ? cache_grow+0x171/0x240
[16304.674462]  [<ffffffffa075ea27>] xfs_da3_node_read+0x27/0xd0 [xfs]
[16304.674494]  [<ffffffffa075fed6>] xfs_da3_node_lookup_int+0x86/0x420 [xfs]
[16304.674498]  [<ffffffff81162bdb>] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0xbb/0x1f0
[16304.674532]  [<ffffffffa0736dae>] ? kmem_zone_alloc+0x7e/0xf0 [xfs]
[16304.674565]  [<ffffffffa073d1c8>] xfs_attr_node_get+0x78/0x170 [xfs]
[16304.674596]  [<ffffffffa073ee34>] xfs_attr_get_int+0xb4/0x110 [xfs]
[16304.674626]  [<ffffffffa073f108>] xfs_attr_get+0xa8/0xc0 [xfs]
[16304.674661]  [<ffffffffa07a1577>] xfs_get_acl+0x137/0x1a0 [xfs]
[16304.674667]  [<ffffffff8117d9c5>] check_acl+0x85/0x160
[16304.674671]  [<ffffffff8117db25>] generic_permission+0x85/0x130
[16304.674676]  [<ffffffff8117dc9c>] __inode_permission+0xcc/0xf0
[16304.674680]  [<ffffffff8117dcfd>] inode_permission+0x3d/0x60
[16304.674684]  [<ffffffff81170633>] SyS_chdir+0x43/0x100
[16304.674691]  [<ffffffff814c4ce2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[16304.674718] Code: 00 00 00 48 89 45 c8 e8 42 fc ff ff c9 c3 55 41 89 d0 48 89 f1 48 89 fa 48 c7 c6 f0 5c 7b a0 31 ff 48 89 e5 31 c0 e8 93 ff ff ff <0f> 0b eb fe 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 8b
[16304.674748] RIP  [<ffffffffa072e2ed>] assfail+0x1d/0x30 [xfs]
[16304.674749]  RSP <ffff88082d02f9d8>
[16304.724644] ---[ end trace eddfa0fb40bb8e11 ]---

...which shouldn't have been possible given the additional locking added
to xfs_attr_get.  Maybe some PEBKAC or something.

-Ben

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-12-06 17:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-06 16:48 [PATCH 0/7] extent list locking fixes V2 Christoph Hellwig
2013-12-06 16:48 ` [PATCH 1/7] xfs: reinstate the ilock in xfs_readdir Christoph Hellwig
2013-12-06 16:53   ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-12-06 17:37     ` Ben Myers
2013-12-06 16:48 ` [PATCH 2/7] xfs: take the ilock around xfs_bmapi_read in xfs_zero_remaining_bytes Christoph Hellwig
2013-12-06 16:48 ` [PATCH 3/7] xfs: use xfs_ilock_map_shared in xfs_qm_dqtobp Christoph Hellwig
2013-12-06 16:48 ` [PATCH 4/7] xfs: use xfs_ilock_map_shared in xfs_qm_dqiterate Christoph Hellwig
2013-12-06 16:48 ` [PATCH 5/7] xfs: use xfs_ilock_map_shared in xfs_attr_get Christoph Hellwig
2013-12-06 16:48 ` [PATCH 6/7] xfs: use xfs_ilock_map_shared in xfs_attr_list_int Christoph Hellwig
2013-12-06 16:48 ` [PATCH 7/7] xfs: assert that we hold the ilock for extent map access Christoph Hellwig
2013-12-06 17:37 ` Ben Myers [this message]
2013-12-06 17:54   ` [PATCH 0/7] extent list locking fixes V2 Christoph Hellwig
2013-12-06 17:57     ` Ben Myers
2013-12-06 17:59       ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131206173729.GR1935@sgi.com \
    --to=bpm@sgi.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.