From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steffen Klassert Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 net-next 0/3] Small IPsec fix Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2013 07:25:35 +0100 Message-ID: <20131209062535.GI31491@secunet.com> References: <1383817670-5783-1-git-send-email-fan.du@windriver.com> <20131108115459.GT31491@secunet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au, davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Fan Du Return-path: Received: from a.mx.secunet.com ([195.81.216.161]:38919 "EHLO a.mx.secunet.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932292Ab3LIGZh (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Dec 2013 01:25:37 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131108115459.GT31491@secunet.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 12:54:59PM +0100, Steffen Klassert wrote: > On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 05:47:47PM +0800, Fan Du wrote: > > Hi > > > > This patchset made below modifications: > > - Fix setting policy index with "ip xfrm ... index=xx" > > which is currently broken > > > > - Using correct name space for home agent when migrating > > key info. > > > > - Put xfrm locks into per namespace to improve scalability. > > > > Changelog: > > v2: > > xfrm: Namespacify xfrm state/policy locks > > -Fix compile error when CONFIG_NET_NS is unset, thanks for the lovely build robot. > > > > Fan Du (3): > > xfrm: Try to honor policy index if it's supplied by user > > xfrm: Using the right namespace to migrate key info > > xfrm: Namespacify xfrm state/policy locks > > Your patches are currently in the ipsec-next testing branch. Now applied to ipsec-next, thanks!