From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754568Ab3LJPpM (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Dec 2013 10:45:12 -0500 Received: from mail-ea0-f175.google.com ([209.85.215.175]:47894 "EHLO mail-ea0-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752002Ab3LJPpK (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Dec 2013 10:45:10 -0500 Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 16:45:06 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Tejun Heo Cc: Christoph Lameter , akpm@linuxfoundation.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/41] percpu: Add raw_cpu_ops Message-ID: <20131210154506.GA1884@gmail.com> References: <20131203233232.928771708@linux.com> <20131203233251.745099192@linux.com> <20131210153445.GE4610@htj.dyndns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131210153445.GE4610@htj.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Tejun Heo wrote: > On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 05:32:45PM -0600, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > The patches following this one will add preemption checks to __this_cpu > > ops so we need to have an alternative way to use this_cpu operations > > without preemption checks. > > > > raw_cpu_ops will be the basis for all other ops since these will be the > > operations that do not implement any checks. > > > > Primitive operations are renamed by this patch from __this_cpu_xxx to > > raw_cpu_xxxx. > > > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter > > Applied to percpu/for-3.14. Please also pick up the related debugging bits: [PATCH 18/41] percpu: Add preemption checks to __this_cpu ops as we don't want to expand percpu ops without doing proper debugging. Thanks, Ingo